Activity for User 1582 - Richard Stauber - viparis@gmail.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done


395 Comments / 227 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
23 Jun 23 Reply Julia, thank you so much for the id! I'm planning on sending Scott a framed print and he will be happy to know the name. I took another shot (actually several for focus stacking) of this plant looking down at the flower, it looks quite a bit different. I'll display in the next few month here on our group's digital dialog page. Jun 21st
23 Jun 23 Reply The complete settings were 92mm focal length, ISO 400, f/5.6, and 1/2000 sec. The smaller the aperture the greater the depth of field so f/16 will increase the focus on that wing (a good reference is https://www.dofmaster.com/doftable.html and it may not be necessary to stop all the way to f/16). But the fact is that the butterfly has motion so we need a fairly fast shutter otherwise we could have motion blur (not focus blur). I'm not familiar with the settings on your camera especial how ISO will effect noise, but if the ISO is increased the aperture can be reduced. And perhaps the 2000 sec shutter may be reduced allowing for a further f stop increase as well. These variables are fully controllable only when the camera is set to shoot on manual. I try to shoot manual whenever possible. Jun 11th
23 Jun 23 Comment Interesting shot, composition and exposure are both good and really good close up. A problem is the focus and loss of detail. What camera was used and was the image cropped a lot? Jun 10th
23 Jun 23 Comment Well done, adding texture and softening the image worked out well. I probably would have used a clone brush to remove that little bit of leaf coming up from the bottom, and maybe the bud too. Jun 10th
23 Jun 23 Reply Thank you. I had to make a wooden frame for the black felt backdrop (I had no volunteers to hold it for a half hour), without that the image would have suffered! Jun 10th
23 Jun 23 Comment The butterfly body and near wing is well focused as is the flower. The far wing is not quite as sharp: I wonder if the camera had been set on a smaller aperture like f/16 instead of f/5.6, would that have brought in the focus on that wing?

In any case very nice, well done!
Jun 10th

3 comments - 3 replies for Group 23

45 Jun 23 Comment Hello Robert, your image caught my eye as I was wandering through some of the groups. I like the image and think you did a great job with post. There is one suggestion that I can offer: try using the perspective tool to make the line above the tram horizontal and the line between the two door vertical. Jun 22nd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 45


4 comments - 3 replies Total


78 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 23

Apr 26

Mar 26

Feb 26

Jan 26

Dec 25

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Sep 23

Oct 23

Aug 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Aug 22

Jul 22

Jun 22

May 22

Apr 22

Mar 22
Group 85

Apr 26

Mar 26

Feb 26

Jan 26

Dec 25

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Close this Tab when done