|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Reply |
I like it as is - leave it in. |
May 15th |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Comment |
I'll try to combine Ed's framing and Kirsti's processing and see what I get.
Thanks.
Rob |
May 15th |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Comment |
I don't find the foreground distracting but I'm sure it would not hurt the image to tone it down. But I do like the foreground as submitted because it provides good leading lines into the main subject and also contributes to the depth of the photo. |
May 13th |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Comment |
I like how you took a normal scene from the original photo and converted it both photographically and from a story standpoint. And I'm glad to hear the back story also.
I especially like the angle of the lighting coming from the upper left into the scene. That is very effective Sometimes without a title or backstory one can make up their own. I had fun with my imagination when I views the image originally.
Congratulations on winning the monthly competition! |
May 13th |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Comment |
Thanks Wd and Kirsti - both suggestions are helpful. I thought about centering the flock but there were way too many of them! I like the original submission a little better and really like Kirsti's processing suggestions. Thanks to each of you. |
May 13th |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Comment |
I think the photo works with it without that reflection.
I like the stillness of the scene and the reflections. |
May 12th |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Comment |
I like the overall composition of this photo.
I'm curious what it would look like in BW.
When I get to my computer I'll test it out. |
May 12th |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Comment |
This is a most impressive photo!
Can you share what processing, if any, you did? |
May 12th |
| 47 |
May 23 |
Comment |
Thanks, Dom. I don't disagree.
I tried to improve the photo through Topaz.
I'll try your suggestions. |
May 11th |
8 comments - 1 reply for Group 47
|
8 comments - 1 reply Total
|
