|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 17 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Good advice , Joe. Thank you. |
Jun 23rd |
| 17 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Hi Glenn, thanks for your advice and the Digital Lighting Guide. I'll make use of it in future.
Many models are inexperienced, which just adds to a photographer's problems. These things are sent to test us! |
Jun 23rd |
| 17 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Hi Stephen, I had not thought of the Rembrandt Triangle, but it makes sense. Thanks for the comment. |
Jun 20th |
| 17 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Thank you for the comment, I'll use your suggestion. |
Jun 20th |
| 17 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Hi Peter, thank you for your advice; helpful comments are always appreciated. I'll do a bit more work on the image.
The photo was shot at home, not in a studio. Nevertheless, I still had some control over the lighting.
The model was only 16, so her mother signed a special release form that gave me permission to photograph Gemma. I rarely work with under-age models but this young lady requested the shoot and brought her mother along to it. These days, one can't be too careful when photographing female models. |
Jun 12th |
| 17 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Hi Joe,
I like the way the trees frame the house, although I agree with Peter's comment that the sky could be cropped a little.
The image is not of competition standard and probably wasn't taken for that purpose. But it is a vivid record of a historical building and would be appropriate for a tourist brochure or a guide book. |
Jun 10th |
| 17 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Hi Peter, I agree that the Union Jack would add even more significance to the photo. The image is full of meaning, |
Jun 10th |
| 17 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Hi Joe, thanks for your comments.
The pose was the model's choice, so let's blame her for it!
You are right about the eye. I had not noticed it but, as you say, it should be easy to fix. Thank you.
|
Jun 9th |
2 comments - 6 replies for Group 17
|
2 comments - 6 replies Total
|
