|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 86 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
I like the aerial perspective in this shot. The image is nice and sharp and I like the way you've processed it to bring in more detail to the buildings. The top of the image seems a little tight, but I don't know if you could avoid that. The only other recommendation I could make is to try the snapseed or lightroom perspective (geometry) tool to straighten the buildings a bit more (some are leaning). You would probably need to do that before cropping. But, that may not bother you and it's really up to you. |
Aug 3rd |
| 86 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
Very nice double portrait! The light was nice and the picture is sharp from front to back! |
Aug 3rd |
| 86 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
Very nice image and agree with everything Jack said. I know this isn't meant to be a symmetrical image, but I feel its a little overweighted on the right side of the image, but that may just be my eye. Maybe, a slightly different angle might have changed that, I'm not sure. |
Aug 3rd |
| 86 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
I like the scene you chose to photograph and the way you used the trees to frame the valley. The side light on the right side of the image seems a little distracting to me (its drawing my eye out of the image a bit). Not sure if you could have avoided that by moving to the left a bit. Just curious if you shot this in RAW? |
Aug 3rd |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 86
|
4 comments - 0 replies Total
|
