|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 85 |
Dec 25 |
Comment |
Cropping down from the top might have emphasized the arch more.
Love the light. I have flown there several times but never tried a shot without the sky. I think your approach is interesting and original, and I will have to try it sometime. Note Boot Arch, about a mile north, might be another good subject for a future trip. |
Dec 5th |
| 85 |
Dec 25 |
Comment |
I think it's hard for a sunset -- no matter how beautiful and this one is beautiful -- to completely carry an image. A person out on the dock looking out to the sky would have helped a lot |
Dec 5th |
| 85 |
Dec 25 |
Comment |
Took the words out of my mouth!
Compositionally I thought the crop was too tight on the left -- the original seemed an odd aspect ration and I wonder if you selected 3:4 instead of 2:3 or 9:16? (My Air 3S has those options). |
Dec 5th |
| 85 |
Dec 25 |
Comment |
Nicely composed and a good location for a photo.
I would have considered darkening the sky a bit. And adding a touch of DeHaze to the entire image.
Echoing Drema's remarks the image needs some vignetting |
Dec 5th |
| 85 |
Dec 25 |
Comment |
In the spirit of full disclosure I just didn't have many comments on this one. Great balance -- the bright foreground trees on the right balance out the red and other structures on the left. Perfect light and location. |
Dec 5th |
| 85 |
Dec 25 |
Comment |
Nice image, good exposure and colors. Perhap wait until the lone child on the far right edge is not in the image? The lower perspective is definitely better
Love the tank...a 1950s or 60s era M-48 or M-60. |
Dec 4th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 85
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|