|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 93 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Ed, Lovely foreground interest. I love this kind of image, The bland sky is not ideal. I wonder if you could not have gone even lower with your camera, That would have allowed you to cut out even more of the bland sky |
Feb 28th |
| 93 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Hi Paul, Lovely composition. The blacks in the image is great but the highlights is too bright. The clouds and the water unfortunately over power the image |
Feb 28th |
| 93 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Jay, I love the sky and the mountain. It is really impressive. The foreground is a bit of a different case. It is neither well exposed, nor silhouette. So it comes over as a bit busy and underexposed |
Feb 28th |
| 93 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Lovely almost peaceful image. Love the muted colours. Agree the path can maybe be a bit lighter |
Feb 28th |
| 93 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Love the image. It is so clean and simple. Only small thin that I would suggest is the small pieces of ice, bottom left corner (being on the edge and being bright) does distract a bit |
Feb 28th |
| 93 |
Feb 25 |
Reply |
Hi. I take your point on the size of the waterfall and rocks. The water falls are small. The look bigger due to the closeup use of the 16-35mm lens. But I take your point |
Feb 28th |
| 93 |
Feb 25 |
Reply |
Hi. Yes it can come over a busy but problem with these scenes are that they are in general busy and you have to break it down to what you can tolerate. But thanks for the comments |
Feb 28th |
| 93 |
Feb 25 |
Reply |
Thanks. Glad I could join. Water was icy. And it was raining. I will look at you suggestions. thanks |
Feb 28th |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 93
|
5 comments - 3 replies Total
|