|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 26 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Thanks! I have not decided which grill format I like better, but I definitely like what you did in the headlight. |
Jun 26th |
| 26 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
I think you got it right on. My eyes went right to the people walking, even though they are small in the image and there are bright areas around. The path, lighting, and the shape of the surrounding land and trees pulled me right in. I would not change a thing. |
Jun 9th |
| 26 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
I find this almost confusing...in that there is no "horizon" or ground-level. I don't think that is necessarily bad though--it is an interesting effect. My only other comment is that there isn't really a subject--although the entire image is pleasant, there is nothing that talks to me as the subject of the image. Of course, not all images need a specific subject--but it usually helps if there is something, even something small, that would stand out a bit. |
Jun 9th |
| 26 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Stunning and unusual. I like how tack sharp everything is--even the "blur" lines. You could crop some off the top as Bob suggests, but it does not bother me. I think this is an image that would benefit from being printed very large. |
Jun 9th |
| 26 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Great image! I see Anges's points, but none of them really bother me at all. I think B&W works very well for such images, and as Jose points out the main cabin is such a large portion of the image it is the obvious main subject. I love places like this, so many interesting things to photograph. |
Jun 9th |
| 26 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Great image and story. The bright-red WD-40 and the Milwaukee blower (I recognized it as I have one!) seem out of place in that setting! I was wondering if the image should be cropped slightly on both sides (on the right to remove the WD-40 and a bit on the left for balance/removal of the empty area) but I am not really sure that would be better. Or maybe just tone down that red can top (the blower is not obvious so does not distract at all). Then again...it really is great the way it is--just adding some nitpicky thoughts. |
Jun 9th |
| 26 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
I just noticed the original (I am a little slow today apparently)--what a transformation! That is something I have learned over time--that an apparently "blah" image can really be transformed if done correctly, which you did. |
Jun 9th |
| 26 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Nice scene; I do like the amount of smoothing you did using a long exposure--even with such a long exposure it still looks quite natural, no doubt because of the distance. Although it does not bother me enormously either, I would tone down the "slide" on the left a bit--it grabs the viewer's attention first, and that is not where you want it. |
Jun 9th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 26
|
7 comments - 1 reply Total
|
