Activity for User 150 - Sharon Prislipsky - sharp71909@gmail.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done

1051 Comments / 535 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
52 Oct 25 Comment Thanks, Mike, Those are some interesting ideas which might save the image. Looking at it closer I found a lot of broken pixels. Maybe if I go back to the original and dont bring up the shadows on the rocks so much I can avoid those.
As I recall you are ight about the wave action breaking behind very still water. That makes sense otherwise me.

Hope you had a good and productive trip.		 Oct 24th
52 Oct 25 Reply Thanks, Tom. The more I study this image the less I like it (as often happens). I too am curious about why I have the wave action in the foreground. I will have to do some research. I eventually cropped to a square and worked on the sky, which helped, but I don't think it is going on my wall. Oct 24th
52 Oct 25 Reply Thanks, Polly, I eventually cropped this to a square and added a red-orange layer to th esky then blended it in so ther appars to be a better sunset. After going through my images from the trip, I found some I liked better. I don't think this one is oging on the wall. Oct 24th
52 Oct 25 Reply You know...that is a really good question. I will have to do some research on long exposure to see what caused that effect. Oct 19th
52 Oct 25 Comment Thanks, Judith. I think you may be suggesting that I have lightened the sky and the water too much from the original underexposed image. I will try it and see what I think. Oct 11th
52 Oct 25 Comment To me the image is very contrasty...tough light to deal with. I think you have done a good job in post considering the conditions you are dealing with. I can't make up my mind whether I want to see the lion brightened a bit to reveal more texture and detail, or darkened to create a silhouette (although the latter might not work because the vegetation is so dark). Have you tried the new making in LR that would allow you to create separate masks for the water and the vegetation? Oct 11th
52 Oct 25 Comment This is an interesting image and I think presenting it in monochrome was a good choice. I am wondering about the identifcation though. I thought water bears were microscopic segmented creatures with eight legs. These look like little beetles to me, but who knows? I would suggest croping some form teh topo to leave only three of the rippples and create a more panoramic composition. Oct 11th
52 Oct 25 Comment Nice capture under very low light conditions. There must be have been at least a small ray of light coming from the right as you've got the catch light in the eye andn the detail on the feet. The subject is sharp. I feel that using the dodge tool in PS or selecting the subject in LR and increasing the exposure slightly would help separate the dark subject from the dark background. Try it and see what you think. Oct 11th
52 Oct 25 Comment Whoa! What an awesome photo op! If I understand you correctly, you shot this through a pane of glass. Well done in my opinion. The subject is in focus, th eyes are sharp and lifelike and the pose looks very natural. Too bad he was on the deck railing but we can't have everything. To me this image is a keeper. I wish something like that would look in my window. Oct 11th
52 Oct 25 Comment To me this image looks technically sharp and propoerly exposed. I think it has a clear nature story. In my opinion, it is somewhat oversaturated, plarticularly the sky. My suggestion would be to reduce both saturation and luminance of blue (maybe check to see if it is more cyan that blue...I can't tell), and dodge the face a bit to bring out some more detail. You were very observant...nice catch. Oct 11th
52 Oct 25 Comment I think the travertine terraces in Yellowstone make fascinating patterns. One could create many different compositions. The color plaette is pleasing and the exposure looks to me to be spot on. I am curious about your choice of aperture. The back portion of the scene is very soft. Stopping down the aperture so severely may have caused that due to defraction, i.e., causing light waves to bend. I like the abstract. I would suggest cropping it to a square eliminating the OOF section then trying to increase vibrance a bit. Might make a nice canvas, Oct 11th
8 comments - 3 replies for Group 52
8 comments - 3 replies Total

166 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 35

Sep 21
Aug 21
Jul 21
Jun 21
May 21
Apr 21
Mar 21
Feb 21
Jan 21
Dec 20
Nov 20
Oct 20

Sep 20
Aug 20
Jul 20
Jun 20
May 20
Apr 20
Mar 20
Feb 20
Jan 20
Dec 19
Nov 19
Oct 19

Sep 19
Aug 19
Jul 19
Jun 19
May 19
Apr 19
Mar 19
Feb 19
Jan 19
Dec 18
Nov 18
Oct 18

Sep 18
Aug 18
Jul 18
Jun 18
May 18
Apr 18
Mar 18
Feb 18
Jan 18
Dec 17
Nov 17
Oct 17

Sep 17
Aug 17
Jul 17
Jun 17
May 17
Apr 17
Mar 17
Feb 17
Jan 17
Group 52

Jan 26
Dec 25
Nov 25
Oct 25
Sep 25
Aug 25
Jul 25
Jun 25
May 25
Apr 25
Mar 25
Feb 25

Jan 25
Dec 24
Nov 24
Oct 24
Sep 24
Aug 24
Jul 24
Jun 24
May 24
Apr 24
Mar 24
Feb 24

Jan 24
Dec 23
Nov 23
Oct 23
Sep 23
Aug 23
Jul 23
Jun 23
May 23
Apr 23
Mar 23
Feb 23

Jan 23
Dec 22
Nov 22
Oct 22
Sep 22
Aug 22
Jul 22
Jun 22
May 22
Apr 22
Mar 22
Feb 22

Jan 22
Dec 21
Nov 21
Oct 21
Sep 21
Aug 21
Jul 21
Jun 21
May 21
Apr 21
Mar 21
Feb 21

Jan 21
Dec 20
Nov 20
Oct 20
Sep 20
Aug 20
Jul 20
Jun 20
May 20
Apr 20
Mar 20
Feb 20

Jan 20
Dec 19
Nov 19
Oct 19
Sep 19
Aug 19
Jul 19
Jun 19
May 19
Apr 19
Mar 19
Feb 19

Jan 19
Dec 18
Nov 18
Oct 18
Sep 18
Aug 18
Jul 18
Jun 18
May 18
Apr 18
Mar 18
Feb 18

Jan 18
Dec 17
Nov 17
Oct 17
Sep 17
Aug 17
Jul 17
Jun 17
May 17
Apr 17
Mar 17
Feb 17

Jan 17

Close this Tab when done