Activity for User 150 - Sharon Prislipsky - sharp71909@gmail.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done

1075 Comments / 552 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
52 May 24 Reply I also thought your greens were too dark. I did some dodge and burn to get more depth in the foliage. It is hard to mess with the foliage using hue and saturation without affecting the green around the eyes. And yes, I agree that the vignette is too heavy. May 13th
52 May 24 Comment As much time as I spend watching Nature on PBS, this animal is not familiar to me. I believe you caught it at exactly right moment as I can tell it is running at a high rate of speed. In my opinion a panoramic crop would be a good choice. I would not leave as much space in front as you have in this version, but enough to clearly see that there is forward motion. May 13th
52 May 24 Comment As usual, very creative. We often overlook shadows as photograpic elements. I think you have pulled out the best part of what could have been a very busy image and made it quite simple. May 13th
52 May 24 Comment Good job stopping the wing action. I also see that you have got the catch light in the eye that is visible. I put this into LR and adjusted the tone curve. See my visual feedback. This was quick and dirty - you can probably do better - but I think the bird pops a bit more. Try it and see what you think. May 13th
52 May 24 Comment These are frequent visitors to my polinator garden and I find it very difficult to stop the wing action. In my opinion some slight wing blur works, but in this case, for me, the motion blur is so significant it takes away from my overall enjoyment of the image. I usually shoot this with a minimum of 1/3200 sec., and there is still blur, so even faster works better. I prefer not to aputate part of a subject, but Mike's crop has the advantage of elimnating the specular highlights. May 13th
52 May 24 Reply May 13th
52 May 24 Reply I think your comments are right on. See my attempt at an edit under Mike's comment. And thanks for the feedback. May 13th
52 May 24 Reply Thanks, Pam. I agree that sometimes it is hard to figure out the the correct WB. I like Mike's version, but had some different ideas. See my edit. Any further ideas you have will be appreciated, May 13th
52 May 24 Reply I aabsoluely agree that the white balance is off and had already changed that before reading your comments. I also think you are correct about the flat appearance of the background. Your edit seems to work, but I would like to have your feedback on my own edit. May 13th
4 comments - 5 replies for Group 52
4 comments - 5 replies Total

169 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 35

Sep 21
Aug 21
Jul 21
Jun 21
May 21
Apr 21
Mar 21
Feb 21
Jan 21
Dec 20
Nov 20
Oct 20

Sep 20
Aug 20
Jul 20
Jun 20
May 20
Apr 20
Mar 20
Feb 20
Jan 20
Dec 19
Nov 19
Oct 19

Sep 19
Aug 19
Jul 19
Jun 19
May 19
Apr 19
Mar 19
Feb 19
Jan 19
Dec 18
Nov 18
Oct 18

Sep 18
Aug 18
Jul 18
Jun 18
May 18
Apr 18
Mar 18
Feb 18
Jan 18
Dec 17
Nov 17
Oct 17

Sep 17
Aug 17
Jul 17
Jun 17
May 17
Apr 17
Mar 17
Feb 17
Jan 17
Group 52

Apr 26
Mar 26
Feb 26
Jan 26
Dec 25
Nov 25
Oct 25
Sep 25
Aug 25
Jul 25
Jun 25
May 25

Apr 25
Mar 25
Feb 25
Jan 25
Dec 24
Nov 24
Oct 24
Sep 24
Aug 24
Jul 24
Jun 24
May 24

Apr 24
Mar 24
Feb 24
Jan 24
Dec 23
Nov 23
Oct 23
Sep 23
Aug 23
Jul 23
Jun 23
May 23

Apr 23
Mar 23
Feb 23
Jan 23
Dec 22
Nov 22
Oct 22
Sep 22
Aug 22
Jul 22
Jun 22
May 22

Apr 22
Mar 22
Feb 22
Jan 22
Dec 21
Nov 21
Oct 21
Sep 21
Aug 21
Jul 21
Jun 21
May 21

Apr 21
Mar 21
Feb 21
Jan 21
Dec 20
Nov 20
Oct 20
Sep 20
Aug 20
Jul 20
Jun 20
May 20

Apr 20
Mar 20
Feb 20
Jan 20
Dec 19
Nov 19
Oct 19
Sep 19
Aug 19
Jul 19
Jun 19
May 19

Apr 19
Mar 19
Feb 19
Jan 19
Dec 18
Nov 18
Oct 18
Sep 18
Aug 18
Jul 18
Jun 18
May 18

Apr 18
Mar 18
Feb 18
Jan 18
Dec 17
Nov 17
Oct 17
Sep 17
Aug 17
Jul 17
Jun 17
May 17

Apr 17
Mar 17
Feb 17
Jan 17

Close this Tab when done