|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 22 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
The composition is very good. I agree with Jerry on the sharpening - I feel it's a little too much sharpening. |
Mar 26th |
| 22 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
Nice capture. Personally I like the original for the coloring. Not sure the coloring on the birds in the final is natural. I agree with Jerry in thinking the colors are too yellow. |
Mar 26th |
| 22 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
You've done a nice job with the sky. Joe's version is a little more dramatic. I like the larger mountain on the right and think it might change the look if it was removed by shifting to the left. |
Mar 26th |
| 22 |
Mar 25 |
Reply |
For me, cutting off the sky would also cut off the tree. I kept it because I liked the way the tree anchored the right side. I'm sure I could do a lot better with the sky in the current LR or PS. |
Mar 11th |
| 22 |
Mar 25 |
Reply |
Thanks, Al. I'm thinking I did this one in HDR - back when HDR was pretty crude. That might explain the graininess. |
Mar 11th |
| 22 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
I agree with the horizontal version. I like seeing the water in the foreground and more mountains in the background. Though it is a rather gloomy day, perhaps a little contrast would help it? |
Mar 5th |
 |
| 22 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
I will echo Joe's comment. I think a little more sky top left corner is needed. Otherwise a great shot. |
Mar 5th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 22
|
| 80 |
Mar 25 |
Reply |
Maybe make an action? It's a lot easier to check and see whether a warp is the way to go before deleting an image. |
Mar 11th |
| 80 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
Nice capture. I will agree with the crop and also to darken the sky spots as Bob mentioned. I wonder what it would look like if the mushroom were to be the only item in the image-removing all the rest of the foreground and background. |
Mar 10th |
| 80 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
Not one of my favorites of yours but still a beautiful image. It appears a little dark on my laptop. Perhaps I'll check my PC and see if it looks better there as I don't see the texture that Bob mentioned. |
Mar 10th |
| 80 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
Very nice. All Bob's comments are the same that I would make-especially removing the spot on the right side. To me, it detracts from the fly in the foreground. Keep up the good work. |
Mar 10th |
| 80 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
You do beautiful leaf studies. I agree with Bob regarding the background. Personally, I like to see an image (especially with a black background) have a stroke to set it off. I feel the stroke keeps my eyes inside the frame and not searching around to see if I've missed anything. |
Mar 10th |
 |
| 80 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
I agree with Bob regarding the lighter background. To me, the lower portion of the flower seems to merge into the background. Otherwise it's a great image. |
Mar 10th |
| 80 |
Mar 25 |
Comment |
I like the way the flowers appear to be "dancing" on top. Otherwise it seems to be a rather plain flower shot. Knowing how much you like abstracts, I tried using the Polar Coordinate "warp" on it. Did some flipping of the image to see what looked best to me. |
Mar 10th |
 |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 80
|
11 comments - 3 replies Total
|