|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 22 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
I agree with Mike. I think the sky replacement and filling in the lower corner is all that is needed. I know it's your style but it seems over sharpened. |
Nov 14th |
| 22 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
I agree with Al about the brightness. Actually, I like the original better. To me, it shows more of the size of the valley and the people seem sharper in your original. |
Nov 14th |
| 22 |
Nov 24 |
Reply |
My bad - yes it was. You get the bonus points. :) |
Nov 9th |
| 22 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
Almost looks like a foot kicking up a ball. The enhancement of the sky looks good. I'm not sure if the moon is totally full as I'm seeing some differences between the right and left sides. At first I thought perhaps you had selected the moon and it didn't make a clean selection. The left side appears to not be as sharp an edge as the right which made me wonder whether it was not full or whether it was a processing issue. Anyway, very nice. |
Nov 7th |
| 22 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
The image definitely tells the story of the artist. Good capture. |
Nov 6th |
| 22 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
Great job on the composite. One thing that sort of "bothered" me is that the turtle is quite bright and sharp and the flowers are more muted and foggy-especially in the background. Keep up the good work. |
Nov 6th |
| 22 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
Very pretty. My first thought was - why didn't you remove the people? Or at least tone down the brightness-especially the two in white. My eye went there first. I like the way you brought out the detail in the mill and other parts of the image. |
Nov 6th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 22
|
| 80 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
I'm going to agree with Bob on the catch light. While it is in the original, I feel it could be less prominent...more like the original. I like the capture though and it would be hard to get the wings just right. Perhaps I'd tone down the background flowers? Good job on the capture. |
Nov 10th |
| 80 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
Love the starkness of the red on the black background. I like the use of 3 leaves-each in a sort of varying step of decay. Very striking. |
Nov 10th |
| 80 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
I like the look you gave to this image. It appears that you rotated it and that puts the bigger bloom at the bottom supporting the other two - good composition in my opinion. I tried to crudely take out that top part that appears to flip over and the lower left white area that is probably part of another flower. Overall it's a nice job on the original. |
Nov 10th |
 |
| 80 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
The main flower is beautiful with the water drops - nice job there. I feel this would have been better as a single flower - especially since the other flower is not in focus, has distracting elements and also creates a back and forth conflict for me. |
Nov 10th |
| 80 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
I rather like the original. However, for a "softie" approach I like what you've done. I feel it could use a stroke around the edges to contain the image and I agree with Rich that perhaps the center could use a little more detail. Overall it's a nice softie. |
Nov 10th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 80
|
11 comments - 1 reply Total
|