|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 22 |
Oct 24 |
Reply |
I guess I just wanted to tell why the jackets were there so I left the sign. Otherwise I think they would just be hanging there without the full story. |
Oct 22nd |
| 22 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
I agree with Jerry that the sky replacement adds to the image. However, I'm not a fan of the orange carried through as much in the lower part of the image. For me, it took going to the original to tell it was a train car. Somehow I lose the train car feel with the textures used. |
Oct 15th |
| 22 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
Very cute. To be picky - I think some saturation in the bow would be nice. The original seems to have more color there. I agree with Al - nice job!
|
Oct 15th |
| 22 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
Perfect looking pumpkins. I'm wondering if a little vignetting would draw my eye into the center more. Exposure and colors are very good. I don't mind the display stands. Good job! |
Oct 15th |
| 22 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
Pretty scene. I think the sky looks a little too saturated and the boat and brush not enough. To me there are two subjects here - the men and the boat and the overall scene of the rocks and water. |
Oct 15th |
4 comments - 1 reply for Group 22
|
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Reply |
Maybe it's because I'm left-handed but for me, I like the position of his flower. The way I see it is that the stem leads the angle from left to right rather than the flower. |
Oct 19th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Reply |
Very nice re-work, Nadia! |
Oct 19th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Nadia. I had some issues with the format as my laptop couldn't save in JPG format-only JPG2000. I tried saving as a PNG. So I brought it into my desktop when I got home and resized it though I thought I had sized the PNG file small enough when I first sent it to Bob. |
Oct 19th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Reply |
??? |
Oct 15th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Reply |
Crudely done but this was my idea. |
Oct 15th |
 |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
I agree with Bob - this is one of your best. For me, I think the Oil Paint filter is just a little too strong - not much but the flat background makes it appear that way. |
Oct 15th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Reply |
I agree..the color should actually be more white. |
Oct 10th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
Quite nice! To me, it looks like the flowers are dancing. I like the dark background you've given it. Good job! |
Oct 9th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
I'm not sure I like the addition of the background blooms. In addition, my eyes to go those two out of focus stems on the bottom. My feeling is that while it's a nice image, it's not one of your best. Sorry, I don't mean to sound harsh. |
Oct 9th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
Interesting abstract. The colors lend well to this process. The original is good also. Two totally different views of the same object. Nice job. |
Oct 9th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
I like the capture of the iris and the textured background. For me, I'd like to see that bud or stem removed that's coming out of the top of the iris. |
Oct 9th |
| 80 |
Oct 24 |
Comment |
It's an interesting concept to me. However, I find the upper left blur to be distracting. I do like the way there are three of the blooms and the blur increases with each of the two rear blooms. |
Oct 9th |
6 comments - 6 replies for Group 80
|
10 comments - 7 replies Total
|