|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 22 |
May 18 |
Comment |
Very interesting and colorful as usual. It does look like a kaleidoscope view. Nice work. |
May 19th |
| 22 |
May 18 |
Comment |
Nice - I like the coloring and the two images blend together well leaving some spots translucent, which I would expect in a double exposure. I'm a little torn on whether I want to get rid of the dark lower right corner or not. There is enough there to make me wonder what is in those shadows. Good job. |
May 19th |
| 22 |
May 18 |
Comment |
I'm probably going to be yelled at but...I don't know that I would consider this a "double exposure" as it only involves one image. Taking it out of that category, you've done a great job with working on this image and getting the background effect. This image might be one to experiment with the out-of-border effect. |
May 19th |
| 22 |
May 18 |
Comment |
I like that this looks like a double exposure as opposed to a composite. The flower does appear a little blown out to me. I do feel the rocks at the top could be removed - perhaps by either using a darken mode or by painting in on a mask. The way the stems seem to be growing through the rocks is interesting. |
May 19th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 22
|
4 comments - 0 replies Total
|