|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 49 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
I like the image very much! I agree that the sky for me is too bright...I am not sure if you can selectively reduce a bit the highlights in that area, even just a little.
The hand of the right corner is also distracting, so I would remove it. |
Feb 16th |
| 49 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Wow, it is an amazing image! I would love to try some of that, but it seems really tricky!
I love everything in there... Congrats! |
Feb 16th |
| 49 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
I like a lot the image. I think it could be improved by adding more dramatism, and I wonder how it looks like in B&W. I think that image could be beneficial without colors. |
Feb 16th |
| 49 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Congrats with your image! I think it is really nicely done!
I would probably remove some elements of the scene, since I agree that it could be a bit distracted. I probably would leave only the main character and the one in green on the right corner. I think that way you would get the depth of field perspective but focusing the attention to the main part of the image. |
Feb 16th |
| 49 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
I like the minimalism version obtained in this image. The reds are great, and the symmetrical shapes give a really interesting view.
My only minor comment is...do you think that you could increase somehow the depth of field? I am not sure if this is an option or not, but my only question about this image is to seem a bit flat.
Rather than that, it is a great image. Congrats! |
Feb 16th |
| 49 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Thank you! This was a main concern for me...The water in the natural version looked too bored to me, that is why I tried to create more vivid tone...I am glad that you like it! I will definitely work on the red tones! |
Feb 16th |
| 49 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Thanks a lot! I will try reducing the saturation!!! |
Feb 16th |
| 49 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Thanks a lot for your comment, I truly appreciate it. Can you kindly specify what do you mean by the amber? Did you refer to the orange colors? Sorry that I did not understand it properly but I would love to improve it! Thanks again!
|
Feb 16th |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 49
|
5 comments - 3 replies Total
|
