|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
I see. Now I understand what you mean in a previous thread about "close aperture". There seems to have 19 rays around the sun, if w/o filter, does this mean you possibly used a lens with 19 aperture blades? It's really a beautiful effect. |
Oct 15th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Oh, yes, the nature is dangerous by nature, take care. And thank you for reminding me the potential danger of irrigation utilities here. It's already good enough from this distance. Really enjoyable. |
Oct 15th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Thank you for your comments and input. Now I understand why you like the second image. With this in mind, I can better accept the big sky now. Thank you. |
Oct 15th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Thank you for your comments and input. The wide version is good |
Oct 15th |
 |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Thank you for your comments. I'll try to understand why most of you more like the second image. It's a very interesting and valuable input. |
Oct 15th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Thank you for your comments and efforts trying to improve the image. The stones were captured in other photos. But it seems impossible to emphasis on the stones while showing the space and its torrential background at the same time. I believe you have done the best for this. |
Oct 15th |
 |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
A wonderful picture, and hope you had a wonderful trip either.
Very classic and wonderful composition: Water + bridge, plus trees + reflections, and cutting off the sky and everything else, just focus on the bridge. Moreover, it's an old wooden bridge which adding a sense of the time in the peaceful atmosphere.
I'd love to walk around there everyday if it was close to my place. |
Oct 8th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Alright... Thank you for your feedback... I always worry about the big sky, so I cropped it further more, but the torrential part will take more space which makes it unbalanced |
Oct 8th |
 |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Very beautiful place to visit and a very nice picture.
Under the HDR, everything seems to be very clear in detail, and the color seems to be soft and uniform no matter for the cloud or the ground.
And the most wonderful thing is, even though everything is clear in the picture, we can clearly see the snow mountain is hidden in the cloud. Actually it's partly hidden and partly visible, which made me want to pluck aside the cloud to see what exactly the snow mountain looks like. But somehow I'm not sure if everything is necessarily to be clear in a picture. Anyway, it doesn't feel bad and it's good to see more details of such beautiful place.
And welcome to this group! |
Oct 8th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Very beautiful scenery which very worths the 1.74mm Panorama.
It seems the spot you took the picture was at the right side of the central axis. Was that intensive? I guess this angle should be more lively than the symmetric one. |
Oct 8th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Oh! This is the sunrise with beautiful rays. But did you use any filter lens? How did the sun light turn into such beautiful rays?
The place seems to be not easy to arrive. But you made it and arrived just in time. That should take a great effort.
And the picture was composed very well with no separation even involving the sky, and preserved a lot of details on the dark side of the mountain at the meanwhile.
Have to say it's really a wonderful work. |
Oct 8th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Very nice picture! I would love more if you name it "Human world in the eyes of sea spirit" or something like that.
Actually that's what I felt at the first glance of this picture. And the three parts, sky, land, and water, are working very well together indeed, very naturally merged with each other without any obvious separating lines. And the bright colors make the picture very positive and refreshing.
|
Oct 8th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Thank you for your comments. And you are right about the branches, I also wished to have a little more branches there to help with framing and use F/5.6 to blur it. But just as you concerned about the situation, if turned more rightward, the torrential river surface would be smaller in space and weaker in strength. It was really hard to get a perfect position. |
Oct 8th |
| 33 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Thank you for your comments and suggestions.
I did take another picture with no branches on the top right, but the sky occupied too much space and changed the color theme as half green and half gray.
And yes for the aperture, but actually in the original resolution it's OK for all the POI with almost every drop of water very clear to see, where the shutter needs to be fast. |
Oct 8th |
 |
5 comments - 9 replies for Group 33
|
5 comments - 9 replies Total
|
