|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Reply |
Hi -thanks for your comment. I shall look to see if I can access your last month's image. I have been working on some of my other paper photos and I am sure there are other ones I could take. It was a very satisfying effort. |
Oct 15th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Reply |
Thank you! I'm glad other people like it too. |
Oct 10th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Reply |
Yes I agree -it is a different photo because of no contact. |
Oct 10th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Reply |
I have never tried anything commercial, assuming my pictures are never going to be god enough. I'll think about it. |
Oct 9th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Reply |
Yes, it puts all the emphasis back onto the ropes. |
Oct 9th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Comment |
Again everyone has said what I would. I think I might have darkened the trousers and the light plank of wood behind his legs, just to emphasise the top of his body. Could you do a bit of face modelling to bring out the lines of the face as he looks much too clean living and 'baby faced' to be a real cowboy? |
Oct 9th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Comment |
I'm too late-everyone has said what needs to be said! Would darkening the bottom right corner help to balance the darker water top right? I like patterns too, Steve. Like you I am bad at critiquing my own photos and miss so many things. |
Oct 9th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Comment |
I like the texture on his shell etc but I agree with Russ that the head could be differentiated somehow -maybe by lightening it a little. Is the black behind and to the right a bit too dark as I can't see any detail there at all. |
Oct 9th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Comment |
I love the reflection in the floor but was there a reason for cutting off the bottom of it? Was it to keep the horizon low in the frame? My only real criticism is that you don't have eye contact with her! I wish I knew when similar events were available for photographers here. Even less likely right now of course. |
Oct 9th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Comment |
I like the eye contact. I also think you did well converting to mono. I'm not sure about the fingers appearing round the vase and I do think having the whole of the hand at the bottom would be better. However, it is a good portrait. |
Oct 9th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Comment |
You are right Steve, I probably would have taken the sky a bit darker. I agree, Jennifer, that a bit more space at the bottom would be good. I would clone out the wires as I found them obtrusive and I prefer Steve;s tilt correction. I'm like him -I don't like the perspective slider but I do use distort and skew frequently because they give more control over all sides of the photo. |
Oct 9th |
| 32 |
Oct 20 |
Reply |
My response to your comments is also WOW. Thanks so much. As you can expect I have a number of paper art pictures so re point no 6, I could easily produce a sequence of images. Not all would be so stark but some depend on going into mono, and all are emphasising shape.
You are right about the position of the stem appearing. I liked the bottom for this.
|
Oct 7th |
6 comments - 6 replies for Group 32
|
6 comments - 6 replies Total
|