|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 67 |
Oct 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Michael, removing those branches seems unanimous. Your tighter crop idea is good. |
Oct 23rd |
| 67 |
Oct 22 |
Reply |
Thanks David, I'll try the additional adjustments you suggest. |
Oct 23rd |
| 67 |
Oct 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Cindy. I thought I might need the light on the branches to reinforce the 'moonlight' idea, but thanks for confirming I don't. |
Oct 23rd |
| 67 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
It took a moment to recognize the eyes as the stump competes strongly for attention, but the challenge and creative solution are noteworthy. |
Oct 11th |
| 67 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
A very interesting subject. I like your crop, but the original colors and crop are also very pleasing. Cindy's version fixes the small distraction in the bottom left corner that doesn't seem to be as distracting in the original.
If I were to try anything it would be to apply a bit less contrast and sharpening, as the soft texture of the original is part of its appeal, for me. |
Oct 11th |
| 67 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
As others have mentioned, awesome pic, and your side lighting is very effective enhancing the sense of action and lighting up those water droplets. I too like the tweak you made, darkening the upper corner. |
Oct 11th |
| 67 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
Great technique for the water -- and other than agreeing with the slight crop aforementioned I could not improve on it. I've noted the waterfall name and location in case I'm down that way, and presume it must be a photog's magnet as Larry seems to know it well. |
Oct 11th |
4 comments - 3 replies for Group 67
|
4 comments - 3 replies Total
|
