|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 26 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
I like the depth created. I do not mind the bright spots in the background, as I think they add to the depth. I think the blurry white flowers in the foreground are more distracting, but even these are still minor. |
Feb 17th |
| 26 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Fun interactive portrait. Good lighting, Do you do post processing on your portraits? Even though I do not feel that way with the boy on the left, whether it is an illusion or not, but I feel you were shooting slightly down by looking at the boy on the right. |
Feb 15th |
| 26 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
I agree with the approach used by Kirsti as being more effective. You could convert it in Camera Raw to B&W, and then use split toning in Raw. I think even a straight conversion to B&W may be more effective too, because you can more easily control the toning, and remove the color as a distraction. I did a quick conversion in PS, and also applied some distortion correction (although not needed necessarily for this viewpoint). |
Feb 10th |
 |
| 26 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Very interesting abstract. I agree with Mervyn's suggestion about cropping the top. |
Feb 10th |
| 26 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Agree with the others about the image and editing. It looks great. Although I did enjoy the previous entry from Greenland a little more. :-) |
Feb 10th |
| 26 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
I like the single portrait, but I also like the uncropped too (with the editing suggest by Jose). Even though the girl on the right is "breaking the rule" by looking away from the viewer, I think she adds some tension and mystery to the photo by her position. And as you stated, unlike the original, you still see her expression. |
Feb 10th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 26
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|