|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 26 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Beautiful arrangement, and great soft focus background. While the swallowtail seems fine, the flowers appear a tad over sharpened. But sometimes a small jpeg will give that impression, when the image is not. |
Sep 28th |
| 26 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
You have indeed captured a moment. I would agree with the cloning suggestions, but of course if you ever intend to add this in the Travel Division, then you cannot make those kind of changes. Sorry for the late comment. |
Sep 28th |
| 26 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Definitely a weird mistake that causes you to look and wonder. Not sure if the blurred top right should be cropped out. Sorry for being so late on commenting. |
Sep 28th |
| 26 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
You really improved this image post processing. I agree with other comments. Sorry for the late comments. |
Sep 28th |
| 26 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Sorry for the late comment. Your revision nails this image. |
Sep 28th |
| 26 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Sorry for the late comment. The color contrast of the water helps to add interest to the action. I do not find the noise level objectionable (at least for a small web image). |
Sep 28th |
| 26 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thanks. Yes Nature does allow focus stacking, but not pano photo stitching, interestingly. Unfortunately, this does not work for Nature due to clones (which are on separate layers and could be taken out), but flower is hybrid. Now if I could only get a bee like this on a wildflower...... |
Sep 10th |
| 26 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
My wife told me to get rid of that leaf too ;-)
I also toned down the colors in that corner. I debated the cropping before on this, but also I am not sure if I wanted the bee to end up dead center, rather than off center. I did take a little off on the left side in this version. |
Sep 8th |
 |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 26
|
6 comments - 2 replies Total
|