|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thank you. I like your version.
|
Aug 8th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thank you. I agree. |
Aug 8th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thank you. My camera has a 720nm filter. The pictures come out similar to the original here. In ACR I use the eye dropper to adjust the WB. Usually, if I touch the clouds or a tree bark, I get a good starting point. Then, in Photoshop, after I swap the channels, I make some WB adjustment with the middle eye dropper in Levels. |
Aug 8th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Henry. This is a wonderful find. I like the trees in the background. Nicely handled scene and picture. |
Aug 8th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Emil. Nice work with the scene. You created a strong IR picture. Yes, the building can be removed, but I don't find it to be a significant issue.
|
Aug 2nd |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Palli. Gary and Jack said it already. Nicely done. Maybe it's not a strong IR image, but it's a beautiful and well-executed one. |
Aug 2nd |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Gary. This is a great find. I got some IR film, way back, but never used it. I like the picture, but not crazy about the dark top/left area. |
Aug 2nd |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Charles. As you know, I often submit colorized IR images. I like yours in color. Nicely done. |
Aug 2nd |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Jack. The only thing I may do is to lighten the structure and add mid-tone contrast to it. I like the scene and the composition.
|
Aug 2nd |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Melanie. I like the scene and composition. Maybe the overall brightness and low contrast caused the loss of some details in the middle.
|
Aug 2nd |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thank you.
|
Aug 2nd |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thank you. Good Ideas.
|
Aug 2nd |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thank you. |
Aug 2nd |
7 comments - 6 replies for Group 66
|
7 comments - 6 replies Total
|