|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Reply |
Thanks, Emil.
|
May 20th |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Reply |
Thank you, Gary. I agree with you. I misread your previous comment and reduced the color in the water too. I like the color in the water, but thought that maybe I went to far. Your version is great.
|
May 8th |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Comment |
Thanks you all for the feedback. Here is a revised image with less saturated cyan and blue colors and a slight vignette.
I kept the log in the water. I think it creates an anchor point. |
May 7th |
 |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Comment |
Hi Emil,
Trees are my favorite subject to photograph and create my own art. They are everywhere and are most often ignored by people, especially when they are not in bloom. You created your own art with the capture and post work. You worked with a mundane scene to create a unique presentation. The tree in the middle stands out enough to create a center of interest. The combination of effects produced a style that may work well for some, but not for others. The image draws my attention and kept me looking at it. I'm not sure about the inversion, but this is so subjective. Keep working with trees. They are great raw materials for artistic expression.
|
May 4th |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Comment |
Hi Palli,
Interesting perspective on this beautiful architecture. The picture takes advantage of the great shapes, patterns, tones, and details in the scene. Nice composition and good handling of the technical aspects. I like the picture as presented.
|
May 4th |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Comment |
Hi Gary,
What a great find and beautiful picture. Your post work was perfect. It was a good decision to keep the front of the barn dark and let the foliage on it stand out. Also, having one side darker than the other creates a sense of dimension and depth. I wouldn't change anything. Nicely done.
|
May 4th |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Comment |
Hi Charles,
Nice work with the curves and the wide tonal range that makes the picture pop. The vignette is handled well. It brings us into the scene, but it's hardly noticeable. The bright light created beautiful play with shadows. This picture is rich with patterns and details. It really holds my interest. Well done.
|
May 4th |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Comment |
Hi Jack,
Nicely composed and handled IR picture. The scene is interesting, and the post work produced beautiful tones and details. I think you cropped the bottom a little too tight. I would avoid cutting off the bottom of the door on the left and the legs of the people in the image. I understand that it will include the enclosure on the right, so you need to decide whether it's too distracting.
|
May 4th |
| 66 |
May 21 |
Comment |
Hi Melanie,
Beautiful work with the architecture. The high contrast works perfectly to enhance the lines and shapes. I would rework the one cloud at the top to reduce the contrast and recover the highlights. The original appears to have the details. I think that both versions, with and without the second building, work. I agree with you that it supports the image. It balances the composition with the main tilted building. I never use auto ISO, so I can't explain why it went so high.
|
May 4th |
7 comments - 2 replies for Group 66
|
7 comments - 2 replies Total
|
