|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 66 |
Mar 21 |
Comment |
Hi,
Interesting bridge and landscape. I like the overall processing. I agree with Jack and Gary that the structure in the opening takes away from the bridge. |
Mar 31st |
| 66 |
Mar 21 |
Comment |
Hi,
The processed image is nice. I think the original composition would be beautiful too. The water adds interest. I think the transition (water edge) is a bit high. |
Mar 31st |
| 66 |
Mar 21 |
Comment |
Creative idea and post work. Nicely done. The sky looks fine to me. It appears that some small bright areas lost the texture, but it hardly degrades the image. Beautiful work in IR. |
Mar 31st |
| 66 |
Mar 21 |
Comment |
Beautifully captured and processed, Jack.
The softer foreground and sky bring the viewer's eyes to the interesting barn and the great textures on it. The tones are handled well. |
Mar 31st |
| 66 |
Mar 21 |
Comment |
Hi,
Interesting scene and picture. I'm late to the game, so I read the feedback and your replies. I like Palli's vertical composition, but I understand your comment about the way you felt. While my first reaction was to add some pop, I don't feel the same with the cropped version. |
Mar 31st |
| 66 |
Mar 21 |
Comment |
Hi Charles,
I like the original processed image. The composition works. The tree trunk adds interest, provides a strong foreground elements that supports the image, and has beautiful texture and tones. It adds depth to the image. The sky and clouds also support the composition. If anything, I would darken the tiny bright area in the bottom left (left of the trunk, just on the bottom edge). |
Mar 31st |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 66
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|