|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
May 25 |
Reply |
Yes, we are here to help each other. Don't worry, as a group we can improve our skills. |
May 23rd |
| 16 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Interesting. Post processing is good. I am yet to understand what this picture is!! Is it a reflection on the wall of the right building? If so, how did you get the triangle area on the left bottom? |
May 23rd |
| 16 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Interesting image. The image is sharp. I liked the color image more than the BW. There are many items to see in the image. I prefer a little more contrast. Tried a quick one with curve adjustment and yellow filter, which is attached below. |
May 23rd |
 |
| 16 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Colorful image. The image is sharp and well lit. There is a lot to see, but I don't know where to concentrate!!! |
May 23rd |
| 16 |
May 25 |
Reply |
Snapseed helped me to process the image in mobile. It is a nice software. |
May 23rd |
| 16 |
May 25 |
Reply |
Thank you Tom. I used Snapseed to process the image in Mobile. |
May 23rd |
3 comments - 3 replies for Group 16
|
| 68 |
May 25 |
Reply |
Yes, I should have brightened the foreground more. The bigger flowers are due to double straightening of the image. There was a mild curve after Canon VR utility. So again applied SPM fish-eye straightening too. I should have avoided it. |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Reply |
Yes, now it is missing!!! Will write again |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Interesting image. The image has nice depth. I liked the way the cake and hat coming out of the window. Well done. |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Interesting composite. I liked the composition. Everything fits well and difficult to identify it as a composite without your explanation. The image has nice depth. Well done. |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Nice work from a beginner. The image has nice depth. I didn't see any window violation. Replacing a bitten choco-fill on plate instead of the one of the small cover would add more interest to the image. |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Interesting 3D image. This is a good example to show the difference between 2D and 3D image. The image has good depth, color and sharpness. Nice shot. |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Beautiful image. The image has nice depth, colors as well as sharpness. There is no window violation. If you have moved to right side, you could have avoided the dark shadows on the floor. |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Comment |
Nice image. It is sharp and has good depth. I too feel that the building is not adding anything special to the image. If a path or something similar leading to the building was there, it may add some interest. |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Reply |
Yes, will do it again. |
May 23rd |
| 68 |
May 25 |
Reply |
Please see my reply to David's comments please |
May 23rd |
6 comments - 4 replies for Group 68
|
9 comments - 7 replies Total
|