|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Nice shot. You could get the catch light on the eye too. The image is technically sharp, but it appears that the bird was shaking its wings. In composition, I would have trimmed a little from top, right and bottom. I liked the reflection. Just tried Topaz Sharpen AI (motion blurr), the resulting image is given below. The splash of water drops from the wings are seen clearly here. |
Apr 21st |
 |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Beautiful Image. Conversion to B/W is the right choice for this original. I would like see white background as white itself. Here it is light gray, some level adjustment will do it. I liked the composition and trimming of the lower portion. The image is sharp too. Well done. |
Apr 21st |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Nice long exposure image. You got the ride with its beauty and movement. To me, the complete removal of the background may not look good. It is better to trim some portion from right and bottom. Reduce the brightness of the lower background, correct the prespetive of left tower and then remove the bright spot in the middle of the ride. This modification will give an impression of the size and location of the ride. Just tried quickly, the resulting image is given below. |
Apr 21st |
 |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
I have not done any sharpening, but only vibrance and level. when I use this double fish-eye lens, only mannual focus works and I used the top portion of the block as the focus point. |
Apr 21st |
3 comments - 1 reply for Group 16
|
| 68 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
Adding a green filter may solve the extra blue from the feathers |
Apr 30th |
 |
| 68 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Excellent shot. The image is sharp with nice depth, good colors and composition. Since the background of the image and display screen are of the same color, I am finding it a little difficult to identify the window. I think such images need a border. [How will we classify this image? Simple 'Stereo image" or a Phantogram?] |
Apr 21st |
| 68 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
A "Cool" phantogram. I liked the glasses and the reflection on it. The image is sharp. The frame looks a little tight. May be a few more space on top and bottom will look better. |
Apr 21st |
| 68 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Yes, the top image pair looks good in cross-eye view. The lighting is unsuitable for the location as it looks flat. You may try with the reversed sequence and some photo filters. |
Apr 21st |
| 68 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Interesting image. The image is sharp and has nice depth. I too prefer more saturation. Just tried level and vibrance adjustment quickly. |
Apr 21st |
 |
| 68 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
The image has nice depth. The subject doesn't look interesting. A spot light on the subject would make it interesting. |
Apr 21st |
| 68 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
This one is after VR utility correction for square image |
Apr 21st |
 |
| 68 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
The original image from camera using the fish-eye lens is given below. The camera was very close, just 2 feet from the centre of the image. |
Apr 21st |
 |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 68
|
8 comments - 4 replies Total
|