|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
If I take a photo from the front, there will be many planes and helicopter behind the plane!!! |
Feb 21st |
| 16 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
If I clone out the tall tree near the left wing of the plane, will it look more natural? |
Feb 21st |
| 16 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Interesting image. Your post processing looks good to me. The image is sharp and full details are available. The replacement of a dramatic sky looks good too. The cropping on top and right side is too tight. Instead you could have cropped only the left side. When you replace sky, give importance to the direction of the light. |
Feb 21st |
| 16 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Very nice image of the waterfall. The slow shutter speed has created a beautiful view of the water flow. The image is sharp and has good contrasting colors. Selective burning above the waterfalI is excellent. I too agree with Terry regarding the level adjustments which brings out the green lichens in the rock. |
Feb 16th |
| 16 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Nice image. The image looks sharp to me. The post processing looks good except that the trimming is too tight and the left horn of the goat is cut. No other suggestion. Well done. |
Feb 16th |
| 16 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
I liked the diagonal composition. Pigeons are fast moving objects. You could get them in focus. Lighting is good too. May be, a little denoice will make it better. |
Feb 10th |
| 16 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Very nice image. I liked the composition. The image is sharp and has nice constrasting colors. The cropping is excellent. I think the hihglights can be adjusted as it appears to be a little over exposed. May be a little adjustment in levels and highlights may look better. |
Feb 10th |
 |
| 16 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Beautiful landscape photo. The image is sharp with nice colors. The composition is good. I liked the shadows of the cloud in the mountain. The post processing is good. I would have trimmed a little from the top to remove the portion of cloud on the top middle portion. |
Feb 10th |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 16
|
| 68 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Interesting Phantogram. I liked the through the window look. The image is sharp, with good lighting. To me, the window appears to be lower than the computer screen plane. |
Feb 21st |
| 68 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Interesting composite. I liked the composition. The image is sharp and has good lighting. Your processing on the color adjustment to the mermaids looks good to me. All components in the image have good depth and placed in proper area. |
Feb 21st |
| 68 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Interesting creative image. There is good depth and I did not find any window violations. I could not find any red spots on the butterfly. Did you change the hue? |
Feb 21st |
| 68 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Nice image. The image has nice depth. The image is colorful and sharp. To me, the image lacks a strong centre of interest. |
Feb 21st |
| 68 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Nice macro shot. The image is sharp and has good lighting. I would have adjusted the highlights a little more to bring in more details on the petal too. |
Feb 21st |
 |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 68
|
11 comments - 2 replies Total
|