|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Nice shot. The composition is good as the centre of attraction is in right placce. I think the cropping can be a little more tight to emphasis the flower more. The bud, to me, is not a distraction. A little vignetting will certainly look good for this composition. |
Jun 24th |
| 16 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Wonderful image. The background is excellent. The slow shutter speed has given a smooth flow to the stream. I too agree that a little cropping of the lower can be done. To me, Bunny's cropping is too tight. |
Jun 16th |
| 16 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Very nice image of the red berries. The image is sharp and colorful with good lighting. I liked the composition too. As Joan said, the leaves look a little pale. I think you can correct the color in photoshop. |
Jun 16th |
| 16 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Interesting concept. The image is sharp with good lighting. Your post processing resulted in more details of the visitors and sky. I liked the details in the hats too. My eyes go around the image and come to the bright clothing of the lady. I tried to burn the brightness on the colorful dress portion quickly.
One suggestion is that if you have an image of the fall without any visitors from the same angle, isolate the visitors from this image and place them a little apart, so that the fall is visible fully. |
Jun 16th |
 |
| 16 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Very nice macro image. The image is sharp and the composition looks good to me. You got a nice catch-eye too. Only distraction is the busy background. You can have a little more vignette. The desaturated image is not impressive and vignette is too strong. |
Jun 16th |
| 16 |
Jun 20 |
Reply |
Thank you for the suggestions. Your cropping looks good too. |
Jun 16th |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 16
|
| 68 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Very nice image. The image has nice depth, lighting and sharpness. The details are available in bright and shadow areas. Good work. |
Jun 24th |
| 68 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Great 2D to 3D conversion. This image looks very nice. Only minor problem is window violation. Nice work. |
Jun 24th |
| 68 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
A good 3D image. There is good depth and I liked the composition. The vignett, to me, is a little strong. I too agree that the details in the lower flowers is lost.
Can somebody explain why there is a difference in color saturation in Parellel view and cross eye view. This time most of the images when saved for LR/RL view the difference is observed. I am seeing this difference for sometime, this time it is more prominent. |
Jun 24th |
| 68 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
A good 2D to 3D conversion. You are becoming an expert in conversion. Good luck. The problem in the window of the house is corrected in the revised image. Good work. |
Jun 24th |
| 68 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Interesting image. It has nice depth. I think, the image needed a little more of the person on the left. If you have moved a little more to the right, you could have got the connection between the man and the pulling of the wagon. In the present form it is missing. |
Jun 24th |
| 68 |
Jun 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Nick. I did not notice the effect of viewing both stereo pairs with either Parallel or cross eye view with respect to the idol. (But leaves get the wrong effect.) |
Jun 24th |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 68
|
10 comments - 2 replies Total
|