|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Beautiful flower image. I liked your post processing. The flower stands out well. You can blur the top portion of the leaf above the left petal, so that the blurring looks more natural. Your second blurred image looks more artificial to me. The flower is sharp with nice lighting. Good work. |
May 19th |
| 16 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Excellent image. I liked the colors, composition and lighting. The lighting from the right side add more beauty to the image. What you missed is a dramatic sky. The panoramic crop also looks nice. (I tried a little burning [4%] of the sky top portion and an overall increased the blue saturation in highlights. I don't know whether it is an improvement!!!) |
May 19th |
 |
| 16 |
May 20 |
Comment |
You got a nice pose of the cat. The both images look pixellated. The details shows that the resolution is 300. The exif details are missing. It seems the original is already edited one. I tried with Topaz denoice and other corrections with PS. But did not get a satisfactory result. |
May 19th |
 |
| 16 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Beautiful. I liked your composition. The sharp flower buds and blurred green background compliments nicely. Your trimming is good. May be, you can trim 3 to 5 pixels from bottom to avoid the traces of the path. Good work during social distancing and isolation. |
May 19th |
| 16 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Nice action shot. The image is sharp with good lighting. I don't know why you rotated the image clockwise a little. The pillar at the jump point looks tilted in the final image. The colorful background is a distraction. I would have trimmed up to the back board from the top and a little from bottom, making it panorama view. Then you get a nice diagonal composition with less distraction of the background. |
May 19th |
| 16 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Interesting colorful image. I liked your post processing. The blurred background looks nice with the sharp hairs. The subject is sharp with nice lighting. Good work. No suggestions. |
May 19th |
| 16 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thank you. It looks better. |
May 11th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 16
|
| 68 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Very nice image. the image looks sharp with nice side lighting. The image has nice 3D effect and there is no window violation. Nice shot. |
May 22nd |
| 68 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Excellent composite in 3D. I think this image needs a frame in our site as the background is black. Except the relative size, everything fits well. Nice work. |
May 22nd |
| 68 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Nice 3D image of flowers. I liked the angle of the shot. There is nice depth, color and composition. The flowers are coming out the window, but there is no violation of the rule. The image is slightly over exposed. It can be corrected. I just tried a quick one with PS. |
May 22nd |
 |
| 68 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Nice conversion of 2D image to 3D. In most of the areas, it is nicely separated. The lower tip of the wings are not in position. The image is sharp and has nice lighting. The background is out-of-focus, which is good for a 2D image. |
May 22nd |
| 68 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Interesting image. The vehicle and the building are nicely separated. The top left background looks flat and there are some distractions. It would have been better, if you have provided the original image to get the effect of posterization. |
May 22nd |
| 68 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Interesting photojournalism shot. The image is colorful. It has nice 3D depth. Everything is inside the window. Lighting is good. May be a little curve adjustment can make it better too. |
May 22nd |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 68
|
12 comments - 1 reply Total
|