|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
The back lighting of the statue looks good. The image is sharp and composition looks good to me. The sky is interesting. I find a little haze in the background. Do not know how to remove it. |
Oct 23rd |
| 16 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Nice nature shot. I liked your cropping. The image is sharp. You were unlucky that the lighting was from such a direction that you lost details of eye of the main bird. The open mouth of all birds add interest to the image. |
Oct 23rd |
| 16 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
You are lucky to have the seagull in the frame at a beautiful position. This adds much interest to the image. Your post processing is good for a nature shot. I have no additional suggestions. |
Oct 23rd |
| 16 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
I liked the image, specifically the back lighting. You could bring back the details in the plants behind the main subject. I prefer a left side cropping to avoid the distracting sign board and partial plant. The white patches on the background can also be darkened. |
Oct 23rd |
| 16 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
A good image of country life. Movement of water wheel has a nice motion effect. To me, the tree background through window gives nice composition, but it is a little washed out. I think you can selectively darken it or increase the saturation. I prefer a tighter cropping. |
Oct 23rd |
| 16 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Nice shot. I liked the composition, lighting and colors. The image, to me, is sharp where required. You have nicely removed the distractions from lower left and upper right sides. I think a tighter crop may also look good. |
Oct 23rd |
| 16 |
Oct 17 |
Reply |
No, the satellite is a photo of a painting. |
Oct 23rd |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 16
|
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Nice action shot. I liked the composition. The image has good depth and sharpness. |
Oct 27th |
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Interesting image. The depth is visible. Correction by John looks good. |
Oct 27th |
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Reply |
I tried again switching the images, but not getting the same effect as in David's image given above! |
Oct 27th |
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Reply |
Yes I have the layers. What mistake I did was, I flipped the images vertically and then thought that I have to switch the images!! |
Oct 27th |
2 comments - 2 replies for Group 68
|
8 comments - 3 replies Total
|