|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 91 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
As I recall, the original image was rotated a bit clockwise, and cropped a fair amount, but I'm pretty sure it is the parent-image. I do agree that the yellow could use a bit more emphasis. |
Jun 12th |
| 91 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
A very futuristic impression of the image. At first I did not like it, but over the last week it has grown on me and I now find it quite appealing. Perhaps you've uncovered a new procedural technique for IR processing. |
Jun 12th |
| 91 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
So, Gary, I think yellow is a difficult color to render accurately in any kind of photography... it often appears slightly out of focus for me. I think your photo here is another example of that. Not sure what to suggest. |
Jun 12th |
| 91 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Striking image, Henry. Wish I could have been there. I really like the impact you have achieved. |
Jun 10th |
| 91 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Chan, I took the liberty of working on your original. Hope I'm not in the doghouse. First, changed the exposure some (in Levels, Curves, reduced saturation, auto tone) then thru a channel swap action that I got from Life Pixel. I guess the toning you gave it allowed the faint blue tone to come through. I now see a bird in the center foreground. Anyhow, FWIW.
|
Jun 5th |
 |
| 91 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Great image, Judy. Rather striking, clear and crisp, and it has impact. Do you find that CLIR is easy to use, i.e., at least somewhat intuitive ? And can you generate a variety of output impressions from the same image ? I've never used it but I know that it costs a bit. |
Jun 5th |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 91
|
5 comments - 1 reply Total
|
