|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 87 |
Feb 25 |
Reply |
Of course, I really was trying for that shot where the moving subject is sharp. I have been working on this for some time now and I think my hands are just no longer steady enough for this. If I do 25 I might get one that is nearly but not tack sharp. |
Feb 4th |
| 87 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
I hope that you don't take this the wrong way but my strong personal opinion is: I think that if you are going to photograph someone else's art, you must do something to make it your own (do an abstract of a part of it...make a composite or double exposure or ICM.)I am stubborn on this, not everyone would agree.
This image is, however very sharp and the colors are nice. |
Feb 3rd |
| 87 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
I like the details idea and that you also simplified the scene to show these beautiful animals. Black and white is an excellent choice as I am sure there is greenery in the background that would have been distracting. Well done. |
Feb 3rd |
| 87 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
This is so nice. I am not going to tell you to step a little to the left! You had to keep the whole scene intact because the cliff, the lighthouse and the see provide both a clear near- mid- and foreground but also the shore creates a nice leading line. My only suggestion: try to punch it up a bit. Use dehaze followed by a small white boost. Probably would exclude the sky from this adjustment. |
Feb 3rd |
| 87 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Chan, I like the colors and the way you processed and sharpened the image. Although the foliage is pretty, I do find the suburban environs not too compelling as a subject matter and if possible would have tried, while at that site, to isolate the tree(s). |
Feb 3rd |
4 comments - 1 reply for Group 87
|
4 comments - 1 reply Total
|