|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 87 |
Nov 24 |
Reply |
IT LOOKS like I did not read your comment correctly. You were talking about post-processing. Apologies. My answer is then, I like it this way, but an argument can be made to make the sky less bright, which would not be difficult to do. |
Nov 26th |
| 87 |
Nov 24 |
Reply |
At night, light-reducing filters are not appropriate. ISO is already pushed to the limit. The processing depends up on preference. If one wishes the sky to appear less bright or less colorful, this can be done in LR. |
Nov 3rd |
| 87 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
Agree, perfect. The sharp head and blurred wings are better than freezing the wing motion. I love the colors. Many hummingbird photos show the beak dipped in a flower, I prefer seeing the whole creature. Kudos. |
Nov 3rd |
| 87 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
I think the colors work well. Congratulations to your wife on her excellent design sense, though of course we ALL paint our walls to match our salt shakers. But seriously I think both the color and the form add to the this pleasing, relaxing still-life. |
Nov 3rd |
| 87 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
IMHO, it takes too much scrutiny to see the unexpected detail. Sometimes a net is just a net? |
Nov 3rd |
3 comments - 2 replies for Group 87
|
3 comments - 2 replies Total
|