|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 87 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
hERE'S A black and white version. I don't love it. It for some reason highlights a lot of lens flare that I didn't even notice before. |
Oct 9th |
 |
| 87 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
I dodged the tree I dont want to get rid of it but agree it was distracting due to the lightness of it. Also, I pulled back the highlights a bit and found a starburst around the moon. |
Oct 9th |
 |
| 87 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Great shot, sharp and looking the creature right in the eye. For kicks, what about a square crop showing just the otter and his head/reflection. |
Oct 9th |
| 87 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
This is a great idea. Technically sharp and well-done. I don't love the composition. Try it again this winter with a less distracting background. Fun. |
Oct 9th |
| 87 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
This is both soothing and fun. Soothing because of the lovely pallete and scene. Fun because I am like, "are those out of focus water droplets or bokeh?" And I am a big fan of square crops, especially for botanical subjects. Nicely done. |
Oct 9th |
| 87 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
This is cool because my first thought was "why does that plane have wheels on top and bottom?" Very sharp and interesting to look at. Such an honest Abe, confessing about the sky LOL. |
Oct 9th |
| 87 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
It's so sharp it's hard to ask for a slower shutter speed. But maybe one stop slower and the wheels would have more motion and the rest would still be sharp. Personally I have had trouble getting a sharp enough subject with a slow enough shutter speed to blur the background, just due to camera shake.
I do sense motion because you can see that in the turn the front left wheel of the car is leaning down. |
Oct 9th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 87
|
5 comments - 2 replies Total
|