|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 9 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
I especially like the composition of this image. I also would like to brighten the tree on the left side. I increased the brightness in the shadows and that reduced some of the impact of the beautiful aspens. So I also increased the highlights which brought them back to my liking. See file included. |
Dec 26th |
 |
| 9 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
You did a very nice job of removing the original background. The lighting is nice and well dispersed. Would this image do well in nature? To me this does not look natural therefore would not fit the Nature category. However, I think it would do very well in a PIDC competition. |
Dec 26th |
| 9 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
This is a nice image taken under difficult lighting conditions. I know you just have PS Elements. In Full PS they have introduced a new feature called "Sky Replacement" which would automatically change your sky to something else that would keep the mood but increase the contrast between the MAM and the sky. |
Dec 26th |
| 9 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
Nice work on combining the three pieces of the image. I would like to see the bird a little larger so I could tell more about it. |
Dec 26th |
| 9 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
The water and the morning dew add to the image. I looked up Bokeh on Google and for the most part your image compares to the images shown by the definition. The web site also defines as "Bad Bokeh" anything that distracts the viewer. To me the light spot to the left of the flower is distracting and I feel it could be darkened. |
Dec 26th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 9
|
5 comments - 0 replies Total
|