|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Thanks Bill. |
Sep 17th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
Thanks Grace. Yes, I agree about the shutter speed. Now I typically shoot MWs with a 15-20 sec shutter speed especially since the newer cameras handle higher ISOs better. |
Sep 17th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
Thanks Larry. |
Sep 17th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Bill. This travel photo looks great. The natural light, composition, and colors blend nicely together. You captured a genuine moment while walking across the bridge. I have no suggestions - well done. |
Sep 17th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
Yes. Great shot! Thanks for sharing!
|
Sep 17th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Adi. It's a beautiful location and it was perfect time to be out there. I've been looking at this image unsure whether the main subject is a single element or the entire scene as a whole. I'm drawn to the root system of the trees and the gentle morning sunlight illuminating the ground. The mountain peak's reflection in the still water is also nicely captured. For me, the 3 vertical trees in the foreground and the bright area on the left side distract me by pulling my eye away from the roots and mountain/reflection. I wonder if a more centered composition might better emphasize the root system and mountain. I tried it just to see... |
Sep 16th |
 |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Grace. What a beautiful spot for a hike and to experiment with your new lens! The mix of yellow flowers, green trees, and blue sky creates a colorful harmony. As Larry mentioned, the image appears overexposed. On my screen, it also looks soft overall. Typically for a grand landscape, a wide-open aperture doesn't deliver the edge to edge sharpness needed, especially if cropping is intended. Of course I could be wrong and the newer lenses could be much better. I like the foreground fence and despite some obstruction my eye naturally follows around it and up the mountain. Have fun with your lens! |
Sep 16th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Gokul. I really like the colors in this image and I think it works well as a documentary photo. The contrast of the white staining on the trees against the blue sky and water has a nice striking effect. For me, the wispy branches and the curved shape of the trunk in the center of the frame add visual interest. While I like the entire scene and would love to photograph it in person, my focus is drawn to the curved tree and its reflection. As others have mentioned, defining a clear focal point and removing all other distraction would strengthen the composition and for me, make it more artistic. I'm curious, does the fecal staining cause long term damage to the trees? |
Sep 16th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Michael. The cool blues and the still water create a soft, almost ethereal atmosphere. I particularly like how only the peaks of the mountains are gently illuminated by the rising sun and moon. My only suggestion would be to consider cloning out what looks like to be a part of a bush on the right and also the bush in the reflections on the right. |
Sep 15th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Larry. People from Charlotte usually argue about which city got the nickname "Queen City" first. Since I'm not from Charlotte, I'll stay out of that debate. But AI does say Charlotte was the original lol. Either way, the Cincinnati skyline and its reflections look great in this shot. I like how the street and surrounding area give the buildings some context and a real sense of scale. The reflections add a nice visual pop too. Like Grace said, there's a bit of blurring on the left and the right side leans a bit but it doesn't really take away from the nighttime vibe of the city. BTW, I hope you also got some shots with the bridge. |
Sep 15th |
7 comments - 3 replies for Group 36
|
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Thanks for your feedback Ed. All the points mentioned were thoughts of mine also. The bridge is small, the sky is too large, keep the dock or get rid of it, etc. The original photo is a vertical format which I will keep but somehow make the image more balanced.
|
Sep 21st |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
Thanks Robert. Not sure why the original is showing as a different crop. I agree with the comments as the image is top heavy. |
Sep 21st |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
Thanks for your feedback Kirsti. The original raw is vertical format which is why I kept the format. I will definitely look at the image again see if I can better balance it. |
Sep 21st |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
Thanks Doug. Yes I like the color photo better too. My image felt unbalanced to me but wanted to share for feedback. Thanks for sharing your vision. |
Sep 21st |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
Thanks Jeff. The original raw image is vertical. Not sure why it looks horizontal on the screen. However, I agree with your comments and will try to make the image more balanced. |
Sep 21st |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Al. What a great way to spend an evening! Taking this photo from a moving ferry at night without a tripod is challenging. For me, the 1-sec exposure made the moon blur, which I think takes away from the photo. Just a thought...since the mountains don't have any detail and the left side of the frame is pretty dark, consider cropping it to a square and cutting out the moon to focus more on the clouds and water. |
Sep 21st |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Kirsti. Cheers to your creativity! The vintage color tone complements the image beautifully. I particularly like the cord because it contributes to the nostalgic feel of an old, folded photo. I also noticed a subtle motion trail from the subject's movement. To enhance the storytelling and emphasize the sense of motion, consider intensifying that effect. This can be done in PS with layers and motion blur filter. Well done!!! |
Sep 21st |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Jeff. This is a really nice high-key photo. The tree upfront and the waterfall in the background balance the image well. There's a solid mix of whites and light grays throughout. The image appears sharp throughout. When Robert mentioned depth, I thought maybe a touch of dehaze could give the photo more dimension. Overall, great job! |
Sep 21st |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Ed. This is a strong documentary travel photo. The perspective captures the full scope of the scene. It showcases the architecture, the people, and the history. Nicely done. |
Sep 20th |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Robert. This location is quite challenging to photograph due to the narrow space and tall buildings. When shooting directly from underneath, the keystoning effect is inevitable unless you have a tilt-shift lens. Like Douglas, I appreciate being able to see the ground where the statue and buildings stand, as well as how people engage with the area. My only suggestion is to open the blacks a bit and maybe step back a bit more (if you can). |
Sep 20th |
| 47 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Hi Douglas. What a great spot to stop and enjoy some reading. She looks comfortable. For me, the image overall feels a bit too bright which flattens its appearance slightly. Using some dodge and burn adjustments could add more depth if desired. The taller tree in the background and the angled metal beam help balance the visual weight of the subject and the wheel in the composition. Great storytelling and capture. |
Sep 20th |
7 comments - 4 replies for Group 47
|
14 comments - 7 replies Total
|
