|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 8 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Clever but maybe make the image little crispier. Interesting. |
Dec 14th |
| 8 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Saturation is little higher side. That's is only my personal opinion. |
Dec 14th |
| 8 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Nice Idea. I think the couple should be there ...it makes it more humane. I would remove the trash, if possible. I would also not cutoff the tree from the right.
Otherwise, this is a very good idea. |
Dec 14th |
| 8 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Nice image. Sharp focus throughout the frame. The humanity and simplicity of the frame is touching. Is the cheek of the women's face slightly over exposed or maybe glistening sweat? |
Dec 6th |
| 8 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
nice and simple but would prefer the angel to be in focus if that is main point of this shot . |
Dec 6th |
| 8 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
some parts in focus and some not. Was it deliberate ? |
Dec 6th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 8
|
| 24 |
Dec 22 |
Reply |
Nice article I see your point of why use Manual Focus over Auto focus even though when you are not using filters. However, Is it true for modern mirorrles cameras. |
Dec 5th |
| 24 |
Dec 22 |
Reply |
That is a good idea I should have tried Topaz sharpen. I am in the process of convincing myself of the usefulness of these AI softwares. |
Dec 4th |
| 24 |
Dec 22 |
Reply |
I debated deeper focus like f10/f11 the standard ones for landscape but f5.6 ..what advantage can I get at 5.6 over 10 or 11. I have some shots same setup at f22.... obviously the results are different ... |
Dec 4th |
| 24 |
Dec 22 |
Reply |
Thank you for your suggestion. I did not use Manual focussingb as I was not using any kind filters in front of my glass. The camera was also on stand , I used aperture priority letting the camera software choose the shutter speed. |
Dec 4th |
0 comments - 4 replies for Group 24
|
6 comments - 4 replies Total
|