|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
Another good wildlife photo from your trip. I would just get rid of the blurred branch in it. |
Oct 20th |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
This is great!! You really captured the detail of the church which is not easy to do! The time it took to take the photos and the post production putting it together is rewarding. |
Oct 20th |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
I like the monochrome approach to this photo. The difference in interest of the two people to you makes it more interesting since it looks like he didn't know you were taking the photo. I agree with Peter that the lights in the upper right should be removed. If you have it available I would expand the left side a little more. |
Oct 20th |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
Welcome Priscilla! I enjoy the photo the way it is. Cropping as suggested might take away from the depth of field in the photo. Hopefully the domes are repaired. |
Oct 20th |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
I agree that we sometimes overlook items to photo because we are looking for a bigger/perfect picture. I really like the way you brought out the details of the buffers. |
Oct 20th |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Comment |
The blur does add more action to the shot but I agree with Glenn that since it's at an angle you may not need it. You did really well with positioning yourself for the shot. |
Oct 12th |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Reply |
Thank you. Fall is now starting to show up here. |
Oct 12th |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Reply |
You're right the rock does standout more and darkening it would help. I do like seeing the water in more detail but also like the idea of having a milky water effect. |
Oct 12th |
| 17 |
Oct 22 |
Reply |
Thanks for the suggestion on the water. I see the softness now but didn't when I looked at it on my computer. |
Oct 12th |
6 comments - 3 replies for Group 17
|
6 comments - 3 replies Total
|