|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 93 |
Jan 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Mike |
Jan 25th |
| 93 |
Jan 21 |
Comment |
Very interesting image. I like what the filter did to thebackground, but I like the original image for the tiger itself (especially the eyes). I don't use Topaz for these sort of things, but I am wondering if you can partially mask certain areas of the image to decrease the impact of the filter where it is not needed. |
Jan 24th |
| 93 |
Jan 21 |
Comment |
Did you catch the guy going into outhouse? Very interesting subject, and I really like the curving, gnarled tree branches on the left.
It might be worth trying a vignette to bring out the house and the interesting branches from the background. |
Jan 24th |
| 93 |
Jan 21 |
Comment |
Great detail on the clarinet. It really shows off the character of the subject.
It might be worth trying to darken and/or blur the black fabric on the left to make it less distracting. |
Jan 24th |
| 93 |
Jan 21 |
Comment |
Great subject. I really like the second image you posted. I agree with Ed on the "hot spots" on the rock that should be darkened a little. |
Jan 24th |
| 93 |
Jan 21 |
Comment |
Nice image Darcy. Like the colorful leaves in the foreground. As other have mentioned, I'd like to see the water and far bank highlighted more, as the foreground's brightness overwhelms it. Maybe using local adjustment brush to increase the shadows in the background and a graduated filter to done down the highlights a tiny bit in the foreground.
You mentioned taking multiple shots, which is a good idea, especially with running water. Varying the shutter speed will give you options on how you want the water to look. |
Jan 24th |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 93
|
5 comments - 1 reply Total
|
