|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
Totally agreed, this crop size much better... |
Dec 6th |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
Such mountain range always bring out dramatic atmosphere, especially with misty surrounding. In my opinion, I will do long exposure for capture the movement of mist/cloud, that will be more interesting to the image. |
Dec 5th |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
This is a good point of photography, however, a little disappointed that just a small part of the sunrise scenic can be seen, if you can climb up higher point for capture the sunrise that is perfect, so that more far away mountains are also including to the image. Moreover, the front rocks may adjust with Dodge & Burn for bring out more details and three-dimensional effect. |
Dec 5th |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
The same color tone image looks attractive to me, it looks like a painting instead of photo. I wonder whether the mountain in front is very high, if you can capture it together to the image ? If so, the composition may more interesting. |
Dec 5th |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
It was just a right timing for capturing the sunrise that just on the horizon line, and the color of the sky adjusted very well done. Those trees colors show seasonal autumn climate, looks beautiful image!In my option, the sun's starburst seems too harsh to me, the morning sun should be presented a bit soft and warm. And in reality point of view, the sun direction is on the far hill, so some area of front side shouldn't be illuminated or the contrast should be more against the area that being shined...please don't mind for too much comment. |
Dec 5th |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Charles, when enlarge the image will see the blur but within acceptable range, 1/20s shutter speed is good enough to capture the motion car in such straight line, even though the reflective light on car had been moving. |
Dec 5th |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Reply |
In fact,I deliberately increase the noise effect... |
Dec 5th |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Reply |
Sorry, I don't know why the image size got bigger as I set 1024 longest side usually....Anyway, here is my final adjusted image |
Dec 5th |
 |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Reply |
Sorry, I don't know why the image size got bigger as I set 1024 longest side usually....Anyway, here is my final adjusted image |
Dec 4th |
 |
| 88 |
Dec 20 |
Comment |
The adjusted image should be correct, Gary posted the wrong one. |
Dec 3rd |
6 comments - 4 replies for Group 88
|
6 comments - 4 replies Total
|
