|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Personally, I think I like this one better, Lou. |
Jun 18th |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
You are right. I missed the decimal point. Should have realized that setting noes not make sense. :-)
|
Jun 18th |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
I thought about that as I was making my comments. Is doing that a no-no in competitions? |
Jun 18th |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
I thought about that as I was making my comments. Is doing that a no-no in competitions? |
Jun 18th |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Your cropping really improved the original. Another approach could have been would be to convert the image to a landscape format by additional cropping, perhaps. And jumping on Lisa's bandwagon, removing the two buoys would be a ggod idea. They do not really add to the photo, and could be distracting.
How's the above for being nitpicky? |
Jun 16th |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Bob, sorry for the late comment. Which house is your? I had to look up "plat". I guess that shows my poor vocabulary. :-)
Back to the photo. I like the symmetry you captured. from a documentation perspective, it clearly shows the different model floorplans, it appears. As always, I am curious as to how high you were when you captured the image? |
Jun 16th |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Hi Lisa. No, I do not have the night feature. And you are absolutely right about the noise work and the muddiness.
Do you have any info on the night requirements and feature? I only know about the time relative to sunrise/sunset. |
Jun 8th |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Whoops. I just realized I failed to name my photo. For lack of anything better, I will name it "Pre-Super Moon". Maybe it was a good thing I did not names it. :-)
The one Lisa gave it is better.
|
Jun 5th |
| 85 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
It would have helped if they would have parked straighter, Lisa. :-) I think you did about as well as you could. You could have ended up with four or so of the busses lined up, but would have been a pretty boring shot.
|
Jun 5th |
7 comments - 2 replies for Group 85
|
7 comments - 2 replies Total
|
