|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 76 |
Feb 21 |
Reply |
Thank you Jorn. I actually agree with you and I don't like to use extensive post processing. I was challenged by a group I'm a member of to do some work in Topaz. I generally use ACR to enhance a raw file and Nix if/when I intent to convert to B&W. Sometimes I'll convert to B&W in Photoshop. I, like most photographers, love it when an image comes out of the camera requiring minimal edits. |
Feb 8th |
| 76 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Cyndy, this is wonderful. Sometimes I'm not that fond of these painted flowers, but this one is different and so well done. The additional post processing you may have done is wonderful as well - removing the other flowers and using possibly a texture for the background. Very well done! |
Feb 7th |
| 76 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Sanford, this is very nice. I envy anyone who has the patience and ability to shoot wildlife, especially birds. I do like the contrast a bit better in the original image. It looked just a tad light and less defined in the image presented. In fact, I was thinking that these may have been switched since the one marked 'original' is cropped. I like the crop and the contrast in the image marked 'original'. Well done! |
Feb 7th |
| 76 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Wow! I simply love this image. The only thing I might adjust is the detail in the foreground rocks. I know that they are not the focal point of the image, but this seemed a bit dark to me. I like how they showed up with a bit more contrast in the original. I think the crop you did really works for this image. Well done! |
Feb 7th |
3 comments - 1 reply for Group 76
|
3 comments - 1 reply Total
|
