|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 11 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Henry, this photo is perfect! Not reading your story and the name of the photo first, it keeps a while to find out what it is. Very good the contrast - strong dark parts and the roots in the light! Chapeau! |
Feb 14th |
| 11 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Very good skyline of Londen, Jim! The portrait format is perfect to show the Themse flowing. What a pity, that the 'eye' is not complete. Only you know if it could be possible toplace it in the midst of the foreground. Perfect in grey scale! |
Feb 14th |
| 11 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Wow, what is that for a kind of insect? AM I right if I locate four preys at a time? It takes time to find out what's happened. This is a very strong story. Sharp enough. My only suggetion would be to lighted up the flys if possible. Even the body of the insect may be a bit lighter. Big photo, congrats! |
Feb 14th |
| 11 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Sheldon, what a wonderful landscape! I like the smooth light crawling over the sand. This gives the photo a perfect texture! The sky looks dangerous and the earth very calm! No suggestions! |
Feb 14th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 11
|
| 97 |
Feb 25 |
Reply |
I know many guys complaining about things they cannot access. Those, who are part of the nature are appreciating photo like yours. I'm doing well in the nature ... :) |
Feb 15th |
| 97 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Butch, building nests, bird often have their problems with the material. That's nature - and a wonderful photo documenting how birds are working. If somebody, who is not so familar with nature photography, should rate the photo, he might be disturbed by the criss crossing of the beak. I know how hard it is to have both aspects in one photo. In my opinion a perfect photo! |
Feb 14th |
| 97 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Julia, I'm impressed! Shooting birds towards the open sky will often darken the object. Your photo brings enough light under the wings and show a blue sky to. Technical perfection! You have placed the object well, you can the birds eye and the sharpness is perfect! Good job!
|
Feb 14th |
| 97 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Thank you guys for your kind comments! This was the first shot of this species - never succeeded before. |
Feb 9th |
| 97 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Ernoe, I choose a shutterspeed between 1/4000 unto 1/8000 to catch a kingfisher doing its job. He is so fast ... Your photo is stunning. Sharpness where it should be and the blurry wings are a very good prove for the movement. And: you've shot the right moment! |
Feb 8th |
| 97 |
Feb 25 |
Reply |
Kathleen, if you would see the bird running, no jumping, in a terrific speed from place to place, you would agree, that 1/1600 is the lowest speed you're needing. He rests only for less than one second at a point to examine his environment. Normally you can get him only with 1/5000 sec and 20000 ISO. Regard the dark background - no light!
|
Feb 6th |
| 97 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
Hi Kathleen. I like your photo; the mirror is great. I'm with Butch, that a portrait - if human or animal - should show the eyes. The more, the better. Not always successful and, like everything in photography, with many exceptions! In this case only a few of them will be sufficant! |
Feb 6th |
| 97 |
Feb 25 |
Comment |
What a photo! Shot the the right time, Roy. Sharp enough to see the water dropping. And the eye between the feathers - perfect. I only have one suggestion to get rid of the green below. I would fill it up with the water structure around. |
Feb 1st |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 97
|
10 comments - 2 replies Total
|
