|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
Thanks for all you assistance guys. My little bird is gaining plenty of acceptances in competition (ND). Happy, happy! |
Aug 21st |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
|
Aug 21st |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
Congrats Mitch. I am impressed by this bird. So sharp!
I don't have any suggested improvements. |
Aug 21st |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
What a lovely bucolic setting Jason.
I tend to agree with the other guys about the distracting elements.
My eyes are immediately drawn to the black bird in the tree.
You might consider sharpening it up somewhat as it becomes a focal point. The eye then fixes on the other 'hidden' black spot (not sure if it is a bird). I would suggest cloning it out. |
Aug 21st |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
I'm impressed! This technique is way out of my level of expertise, so I will just say Congratulations!
Very creative (and very clever!). |
Aug 21st |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
What a striking image. My comments have already been noted by the others. Great shot. Good luck with it Sunil! |
Aug 21st |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
Fantastic night view!
I must agree with Sunil. I prefer 16X9 version also but I would rather include a little more of the colourful water and less of the sky. |
Aug 21st |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
What a fabulous image Brenda! Congratulations!
The only suggestion that I could offer would be to rotate the image a little to the right so that a strong diagonal line runs from the left-hand bird's wing tip down to the right-hand bird's right-hand tail feather.
Good luck with this image, it is sure to attract attention in comps! |
Aug 21st |
 |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Reply |
I rotated and found an angle that would eliminate most of the extraneous foliage. Thx Jim! |
Aug 13th |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Reply |
Thanks for the Gigapixel hint Brenda! |
Aug 13th |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Reply |
Thank Mitch. I am very impressed that you named by little bird! Thanks for the Topaz sharpen hint. |
Aug 13th |
| 78 |
Aug 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Jason et al
I fiddled quite a bit, but came up with this version that remains compliant with the Nature rules.
What do you think? |
Aug 13th |
 |
8 comments - 4 replies for Group 78
|
8 comments - 4 replies Total
|
