|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 21 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
Here's a new rendition bouncing off of Brian's creativity. |
Nov 7th |
 |
| 21 |
Nov 20 |
Reply |
Brian, I really like your rendition. It creates more movement. I'll play with it some more because I would love to see her being drawn towards the light and out of darkness. Maybe I just need to flip her image.Thanks
|
Nov 7th |
| 21 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
Phillipa, thanks for your imaginative work of taking a still life and making it dynamic. The lighting is great in the way it accents the handles and various curves. For me it was a little dark so I decided to see what it might look like if it were a little lighter. I took it into camera raw and then played with brightness and contrast. I also took out the light spots on the bottom two pieces of pottery. Thanks for letting me learn from your piece of art. |
Nov 6th |
 |
| 21 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
Joan, the composite of something rough, like the sage, and something smooth, like the balloons, is a great idea. It makes for a very interesting visual. I do like the way the sage forms a flowing ribbon along the top. For my taste the violetpink in the top right hand corner is distracting. I played around with your image using the color selection in Photoshop. I'm not sure I like what I came up with but it was fun trying. Thanks.
|
Nov 6th |
 |
| 21 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
Brian, I agree with the others that this is a beautiful piece of abstract art. I too like the primary focal point to the side. It is hard to imagine that this came from the casual picture of your friend. I look forward to experimenting using some of your Photoshop techniques. Thanks for including them in such detail. |
Nov 6th |
| 21 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
Peter, it always amazes me how something that so many people look past, like your rusty pipe, can be made into a piece of art. You have a good eye. I do like your second rendition better than the first. The variety of colors and darker border add to its eye appeal for me. The original number two seems to be much sharper than your final product. Is that because each time you manipulate a picture it loses some clarity? |
Nov 6th |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 21
|
5 comments - 1 reply Total
|
