|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 42 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
It depends on what is allowed for wildlife. For PSA I do not believe the color can be changed. This was taken with the jungle in the back round. It probably could be made darker but I am not sure. |
Oct 25th |
| 42 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
I should have added that this is the F4 version which is much lighter and is a better lens than the F2.8 |
Oct 25th |
| 42 |
Oct 17 |
Reply |
Obviously this was not a problem with this lens. |
Oct 25th |
| 42 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
The dog is sharp. I like that it is looking at you. I do not like that you are looking down and that the entire dog is not in the photo. |
Oct 20th |
| 42 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Beautiful photo. I would crop as much sky as possible as it does add anything. |
Oct 20th |
| 42 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
The eyes and the beak are sharp. This is a real plus. I think an S curve might help. I have 2 owl habitats that I have built in Vegas if anyone get this way.
|
Oct 20th |
| 42 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
The head is quite sharp. That is the important part . I would have gone for more depth with F16-22. A lab report will tell you that is not the sharpest part of the lens but in reality I do not think you would be able to tell the difference. More detail in the wings would add to the photo in my opinion. |
Oct 20th |
| 42 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
There is a bright square in the photo and it's reflection. I do not know what it is but i would get rid of it. The entire reflection is not there anyway so I would crop some off of the bottom as is does not add interest. |
Oct 20th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 42
|
7 comments - 1 reply Total
|