|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 94 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Actually, I don't think it can be symmetrical. The picture is not symmetric around the horizon. It would be symmetric if the birds were all the same distance from the camera or if the sun were directly over head. |
Sep 10th |
0 comments - 1 reply for Group 94
|
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
And since my first adaptation would be to reduce the aperture (increase depth of field), I'd like to hear how you handle that trade-off. |
Sep 10th |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
And since my first adaptation would be to reduce the aperture (increase depth of field), I'd like to hear how you handle that trade-off. |
Sep 9th |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Like Thorro, I would like to see your shutter speed rules. If they're not too long, would you be willing too post them here? |
Sep 9th |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
As a life time educator, I love critical feedback. Of course my ego embraces a smattering of praise (hard to deny), but I deeply hope that the level of criticism/advice doesn't abate. What a great group! How pleased I am to learn from everybody. |
Sep 2nd |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
I use Servo AF, and I can't find anything about a "finer" servo, such as Animal or Eye tracking. |
Sep 1st |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Steve. I use a Canon R (I'm anxious to hear about your new R5!), and I use point focus - no excuse for the lack of focus on the birds. In fact, one nice things anout gulls is that they're quite slow and stable. My real challenge is my love of dragonflies, especially tiny damselflies which really challenge my AF. |
Sep 1st |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thank you Steve. What luck that being witness to this nurturing act should also yield some nice images. Stan |
Sep 1st |
1 comment - 6 replies for Group 97
|
1 comment - 7 replies Total
|
