|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 85 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I'm with Lisa on this one. I might have pointed the gimble/camera down to lose some of the bald sky and give more foreground. I don't normally take images from this high of an altitude, but I should get in the habit or remembering to go up and have a look around while I'm at a location. Nice work. |
Sep 23rd |
| 85 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I really like this image and everything you did in post processing really resulted in making the image as compelling as it is. I might have darkened the sky down yet another stop, but that is just personal preference. Masterfully done! |
Sep 23rd |
| 85 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Fantastic story to support this image. To have used a lower altitude would have rendered larger images of the destroyed boat parts, but then you miss the power of the river. A balancing act here, and you have probably chosen the better of the two alternatives. |
Sep 23rd |
| 85 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Dang, girl you got some fantastic light! The long drive up was worth it. Echo earlier comment about Tripod mode....although you did just fine in the Performance mode and a light, but steady hand. In these situations I sometimes also do a composite pano shot as well as a video. I believe there is a setting that allows you to grab all the individual pano images in RAW and then do a conversion on your computer. The default is to let the drone do the conversion, but it is only available in JPEG. Nice video! Congrats.
|
Sep 23rd |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 85
|
4 comments - 0 replies Total
|
