|
Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
I like this version, the viewer feels closer to the surface. |
Mar 16th |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Welcome to our group. I share Jim's constructive reaction to your photo. Downed trees are the subject, so zoom in on some strong trunks and leave out the sky and hill. |
Mar 15th |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
I concur with Jim's suggestion, the horses' heads would add to the image. |
Mar 15th |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
I like Jim's crop better than mine. It emphasizes the trunks, eliminating the ones obscured by the thicket of branches on the left. I would not have noticed the "bad haircut" if Jim hadn't mentioned it. |
Mar 15th |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Jim's version eliminates the left-right symmetry, an important element - even though imperfect - in the original. |
Mar 15th |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Thanks for the tip on IR for landscape haze reduction. |
Mar 15th |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
You chose a flight perfectly timed for side lighting. |
Mar 4th |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
This photo holds a viewer's attention. |
Mar 4th |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
IR works well for this scene. And the balanced crop shows your attention to detail. |
Mar 2nd |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
My eyes were drawn from the tangled branches on top to the more defined lower trunks and the symmetry of their reflections, emphasized in the attached crop. |
Mar 2nd |
 |
11 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
A background pole sticking out of a subject's head is a common problem. Your mono conversion fixed it. |
Mar 2nd |
11 comments - 0 replies for Group 11
|
11 comments - 0 replies Total
|