|
Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
11 |
Feb 20 |
Reply |
I like your tonal contrasts in the water. Further brightening could push the dark tones closer to the whites, making the surface appear smoother and the flow less violent. |
Feb 15th |
11 |
Feb 20 |
Comment |
I concur with earlier praise for your capture of the power in the water flow, focal length and shutter speed were perfect. Henry's darkening of the foliage along the channel is a helpful addition to the contrast. |
Feb 13th |
11 |
Feb 20 |
Comment |
Intriguingly weird. The 12mm perspective makes the pole look like a giant pencil tip or a rocket nose cone. You were right to go monochrome, the saturated orange and blue colors on the building pull attention away from the interesting geometry. |
Feb 13th |
11 |
Feb 20 |
Comment |
Compared to the original color version, your monochrome image seems a little flat. In Lightroom I added an S curve, some Texture, and a boost to the Whites to increase contrast. |
Feb 12th |
 |
11 |
Feb 20 |
Comment |
Three layers of contrast: tones, shapes, and textures. Each carefully brought out. This image grabbed and held my attention, don't change a thing. |
Feb 12th |
11 |
Feb 20 |
Comment |
Your friends chose the right photographer. Instead of a portrait of individuals, you have captured the bond between them. |
Feb 12th |
11 |
Feb 20 |
Comment |
Like an X-Ray, your processing extracts the underlying structure. And finds a strong arrangement of lines, curves, and empty space. I learned a lot studying your original and final images. |
Feb 12th |
11 |
Feb 20 |
Reply |
I like both your revisions. |
Feb 8th |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 11
|
53 |
Feb 20 |
Comment |
Another example of cats being better models than humans. |
Feb 20th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 53
|
7 comments - 2 replies Total
|