|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Reply |
I think you are correct with the structure slider removing some of the softness. I do find that the change in cropping to include the "back side" of the other monkey distracting, when I cropped that out but left the tail it reminded me of a snake to that had to go to also (content-aware magic). |
Jul 19th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Reply |
I do like the additional hi lights made to the eyes it really does make them more apparent. I'm not sure about removing the branch, I had left it in as a framing device for the face. The ability to remove the branch and recreate the portion of the face that was missing always amazed me and you did a good job on it. |
Jul 19th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
Nice photo, I had to go outside and look closer at my cherry tomato plants and see that yes this is what they look like. The objects that are contained within your dof focus are sharp (high shutter speed), but the f/4 aperture created a narrow dof. I find when I shoot flowers in my garden I have to use a high shutter speed as any slight breeze will blur them. I am starting to use a flash so I can increase the aperture (decrease to make smaller??) to create a larger dof. I still need lots of practice |
Jul 9th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
Nice b&w image of a solitary object. Cropped well, a nice desolate feel to the area. The tree seems a little blurry and the foreground sharp pulling my attention from the tree to the foreground which then changes my perception of the image. |
Jul 9th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Reply |
I like this cropping as it brings the tree closer to the viewer setting it as the dominant part of the image. Given all the "rules" of composition in photography this images works by ignoring many of them. |
Jul 9th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Reply |
I think with this edit the center of attention changed from the tree to the foreground as the tree looks fuzzy and the foreground is now very sharp. |
Jul 9th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Reply |
Print ads are often set to scan starting at the top left in an "S" shape with our eyes leaving the ad at the bottom right. The bottom right corner is often what we remember so that is where the logo/company/product name goes. I agree that it has to do with reading left to right. |
Jul 9th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
The sky replacement was a great way to boost the interest in this photo, it really makes the image story pop. I also like that you flipped the photo and I often wonder why flipping impacts our perception of the photo? Nicely done. |
Jul 7th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
Interesting mood to the entire photo, old tv, messed up floor an overall feeling of old not cared for which matches the attendants feeling of not impressed. I like the editing by Linda, it does pull more attention to the attendant. For whatever reason I keep looking for the attendants feet and for the rest of the radiator. Missing feet often distract me. |
Jul 7th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
The second I opened this photo I thought robots confronting each other (retired tech-ed middle school teacher nightmare). I think the positioning of the navigation instruments in such a manner was an excellent creative idea. I think the background is somewhat distracting as is. Perhaps just a solid color but my imagination says something movie related like an old movie poster with something science fiction related. |
Jul 7th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
The mono version looks a little sinister with the dark clouds and the car ready to go. Cropping out the cars on the left definitely focuses the attention. The overall photo looks like it tilts to the right a little to me but it may just be the parking lot. The dark clouds moving in make this shot dramatic. |
Jul 7th |
| 99 |
Jul 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Peter, it does look better, i will have to check topaz denoise. |
Jul 7th |
6 comments - 6 replies for Group 99
|
6 comments - 6 replies Total
|
