|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 45 |
Jan 19 |
Comment |
Lot of history and culture here. Was privacy being invaded here? Might the people in the picture have objected to being photographed had they realized what was happening? I thought the strings hanging down the backside of the young man were part of a prayer shawl. Excellent print quality. |
Jan 17th |
| 45 |
Jan 19 |
Comment |
Welcome to #45!! The full image and the cropped versions are both fine. However, I do have some preference for the full image - it leads my eye to the fireworks. |
Jan 17th |
| 45 |
Jan 19 |
Reply |
The focus issue, upper right, I recall is in the actual weave of the material, not camera optics. |
Jan 17th |
| 45 |
Jan 19 |
Comment |
The lily pad at the left it too strong and pulls the eye away from the white flower. Might the flower be oversharpened - some picky judge call it "photoshopped"? |
Jan 6th |
| 45 |
Jan 19 |
Reply |
I more or less agree with the comments about the bottom row and thought of cropping it out. But, this was the full frame in camera and and I wanted to use it all. My original framing was less than ideal because I was cramped in the aisle of the shop. |
Jan 6th |
| 45 |
Jan 19 |
Comment |
You nailed it! Definitive. Great head-shot, especially eyes and bills. Someone at the Audubon Society will gasp in ecstasy over this image. Very effective cropping. |
Jan 1st |
| 45 |
Jan 19 |
Comment |
You captured it: Bird Walking on Water. I like the back-lighting showing wing feathers. Other than some light on the bird's head, I cannot suggest any improvements. Catch-light in eye? A snack in its beak? |
Jan 1st |
| 45 |
Jan 19 |
Comment |
A whimsical shot. It is what it is, as they say. Well exposed - could have been cropped, but why? The extraneous scenery puts the subjects in context. Stilt-walking must be tiring. |
Jan 1st |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 45
|
6 comments - 2 replies Total
|